2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dengue tetravalent DNA vaccine inducing neutralizing antibody and anamnestic responses to four serotypes in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
79
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
79
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to these examples, several other reports (e.g., [15][16][17]), as well as our own studies found that it is possible to deliver combinations of certain DNA vaccines without interference with the magnitude or breadth of the immune response to the individual components. For example, we found no notable interference in immune responses elicited in animals given a combination of DNA vaccines for Ebola virus, Marburg virus, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, and anthrax [18].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast to these examples, several other reports (e.g., [15][16][17]), as well as our own studies found that it is possible to deliver combinations of certain DNA vaccines without interference with the magnitude or breadth of the immune response to the individual components. For example, we found no notable interference in immune responses elicited in animals given a combination of DNA vaccines for Ebola virus, Marburg virus, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, and anthrax [18].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…DNA immunization with constructs displaying the same antigenic determinants but different secretory capacity allowed us to demonstrate that antigen secretion is indeed an important characteristic to take into consideration for the design of efficient genetic vaccines. This could explain the poor immunological performances of many constructs so far tested (De Paula et al, 2008;Konishi et al, 2006;Lima et al, 2011;Raviprakash et al, 2000). We show that strategies based on chimerism could be used to enhance the antibody response against epitopes that are otherwise poorly secreted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although there are a number of studies describing DNA vaccines against dengue Azevedo et al, 2011;Galula et al, 2014;Khanam et al, 2006;Konishi et al, 2006;Ocazionez Jimenez & Lopes da Fonseca, 2000;Prompetchara et al, 2014;Ramanathan et al, 2009;Raviprakash et al, 2001Raviprakash et al, , 2006, to date there has been only one human clinical trial for a dengue DNA vaccine involving a Phase 1 study of a plasmid expressing the PrM and E proteins of DENV1 . In all cases, these vaccines have been proved to be safe and well-tolerated in humans, although low immunogenicity is still a concern associated with genetic vaccines in general (Coban et al, 2011;Danko et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaccination is a preventative method that may prove successful, as it has with other infectious diseases (3). Several dengue vaccine candidates are being developed using different approaches, such as live attenuated (4)(5)(6)(7)(8), chimeric (8)(9)(10), recombinant subunit (8,(11)(12)(13)(14), and DNA vaccines (8,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%