2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dengue virus infections: comparison of methods for diagnosing the acute disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis is strengthened by data demonstrating NS1 and the circulating virus in the serum with the absence of immunoglobulins (9,14,12,20). The sensitivity of the test used in the hospital was fundamental to the early diagnosis of DENV infection in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This hypothesis is strengthened by data demonstrating NS1 and the circulating virus in the serum with the absence of immunoglobulins (9,14,12,20). The sensitivity of the test used in the hospital was fundamental to the early diagnosis of DENV infection in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With the increasing incidence of DENV infection, early diagnosis principally during the acute phase of the illness will be a public health priority in Brazil (9,10). Routine diagnostic test for DENV are based on the detection of NS1 viral protein and serum anti-DENV IgM/IgG (11,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular methods for detecting DEN nucleic acid include nested RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR, in which the serotype is identified in separate reaction mixtures (1,20,22,30). The nested RT-PCR assay that is widely used in laboratories to identify DEN serotypes was found to be 10-fold more sensitive than the fourplex real-time RT-PCR assay (11,20,27). However, the fourplex real-time RT-PCR assay is faster than standard nested RT-PCR, as results from the real-time RT-PCR are available in approximately 3 h, compared to 10 h or more for the nested RT-PCR, which is the time required to run separate RT-PCR and PCRs and to visualize the PCR product by electrophoresis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast none of the other two DENV-3 viruses used induced any detectable viremia after plaque assay on Vero cells. We have analyzed vire- 1.4 1.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.5 1.8 0.9 8 mia for the 3 monkeys that received the DENV-3 74886 virus by real-time RT-PCR according to the methodology described by Poersch et al (2005). Monkey N44 showed 4 days of viremia whereas monkey O48 presented 1 day only and monkey M50 was not viremic by this assay either.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be argued that Vero cell plaque efficiency may differ among strains or serotypes and that the assays could have detected only a subpopulation not represented in the inoculum. In this regard the use of nucleic acid amplification procedures such as real-time PCR (Houng et al 2001, Poersch et al 2005 has been established for the quantification of DEN viral RNA in biological samples. Although it is true that measuring RNA copies may better reflect ongoing viral replication and would, therefore, be more appropriate to assess protective efficacy, the plaque assay reflects fully functional viral particles and not RNA molecules alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%