2007
DOI: 10.1080/00016340601159199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Denial of pregnancy ‐ characteristics of women at risk

Abstract: The group of women with denied pregnancy was heterogeneous, and a clear-cut typology of a 'pregnancy denier' could not be established.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
61
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
61
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows a huge diversity of causative events specific to each woman concerned and explains that risk factors for denial of pregnancy identified in literature are neither necessary nor sufficient conditions (see p. 6 in 'Current understanding of denial of pregnancy'). This also supports that there is no clear-cut typology of a pregnancy denier Jenkins et al (2011);Wessel et al (2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This allows a huge diversity of causative events specific to each woman concerned and explains that risk factors for denial of pregnancy identified in literature are neither necessary nor sufficient conditions (see p. 6 in 'Current understanding of denial of pregnancy'). This also supports that there is no clear-cut typology of a pregnancy denier Jenkins et al (2011);Wessel et al (2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Denial was also observed in otherwise well-adjusted women that respond to none of these conditions Jenkins et al (2011). It is thus commonly accepted that the heterogeneity of affected women prevents the definition of a clear-cut typology of a pregnancy denier Jenkins et al (2011);Wessel et al (2007). However, beyond the diversity of this list of external risk factors, it must be noted that the hypothesis that a psychological conflict may constitute an underlying cause for denial of pregnancy appears recurrently in research papers for 40 years Jenkins et al (2011); Uddenberg and Nilsson (1975); Sandoz (2016b).…”
Section: /14mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bu dönemden sonra fark edilmeyen gebelik yaþayan kadýnlarýn eskiden düþünülenin aksine birden fazla doðum yapmýþ, sosyal desteði kuvvetli, öðrenci ya da çalýþan kadýn-larda daha sýk olduðu düþünülmeye baþlanmýþ ve bu hastalarýn çok azý madde kullaným, psikiyatrik hastalýk öyküsü ve düþük zekâ ile iliþkili bulunmuþ-tur (12). Genç yaþ, düþük zekâ ve düþük sosyoekonomik durum, genel cinsel bilgi eksikliði tanýmlansa da bunun tam tersinin olabileceði, hiçbir cinsel istismar ya da psikiyatrik öyküsünün olmayabileceði de bildirilmiþtir (15). Vurgulanabilecek önemli bir nokta, partner tarafýndan þiddete maruz kalýyor olmanýn artmýþ fark edilmeyen gebelik riskiyle iliþkili olduðu þek-lindedir (28).…”
Section: Risk Etmenleriunclassified
“…Literatürdeki olgu örneklerine bakýldýðýnda bu kadýnlarýn heterojen bir grup oluþturduðu görülmektedir (15). Google Scholar ve PubMed veritabanlarýnda 1994-2017 yýllarýný kapsayan, "denial pregnancy", "unpercieved pregnancy", "gebelik inkarý", "fark edilmeyen gebelikler" anahtar kelimeleri ile yapýlan taramada tespit edilen ve tam metnine eriþilebilen yayýnlarýn özeti Tablo 3'te sunulmuþtur (2,4,7,11,12,15,17,19,23,26,28,(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49).…”
Section: Risk Etmenleriunclassified