1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0717(98)00013-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Denitrification in surface soils of a riparian forest: Effects of water, nitrate and sucrose additions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issues that still exist in identifying when negative fluxes of N 2 O are real or caused by instrumental noise using a high-precision QCL instrument suggests that more commonly used N 2 O flux measurement methodologies, such as the static chamber method, would have been unable to measure negative fluxes of N 2 O with the precision required to identify if they are real or not. The results of this study suggest that large negative fluxes reported in the literature may in fact indicate a larger detection limit of an individual methodology than previously thought, which may explain many reports of negative flux measurements in the literature (Jordan et al, 1998;Flechard et al, 2005;. Certainly, the majority of negative fluxes reported in this study were most likely caused by instrumental noise (as shown by Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The issues that still exist in identifying when negative fluxes of N 2 O are real or caused by instrumental noise using a high-precision QCL instrument suggests that more commonly used N 2 O flux measurement methodologies, such as the static chamber method, would have been unable to measure negative fluxes of N 2 O with the precision required to identify if they are real or not. The results of this study suggest that large negative fluxes reported in the literature may in fact indicate a larger detection limit of an individual methodology than previously thought, which may explain many reports of negative flux measurements in the literature (Jordan et al, 1998;Flechard et al, 2005;. Certainly, the majority of negative fluxes reported in this study were most likely caused by instrumental noise (as shown by Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In addition, there was no interaction between C and NO 3 ( addition on denitrification. Previous studies reported an increase in denitrification rate with increasing NO 3 ( addition (Jordan et al 1998;Strong and Fillery 2002), whereas others measured no significant effect of NO 3 ( addition on denitrification (Myrold and Tiedje 1985;De Klein and Van Logtestijn 1996). Jordan et al (1998) and Strong and Fillery (2002) observed an effect of NO 3 ( addition where soil NO ( 3 concentrations were very low (0Á15 mg N kg…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Increased soil NO 3 ( concentrations can result in increased denitrification and N 2 O emissions (Smith et al 1998). However, while denitrification may be NO 3 ( limited in some cases (Jordan et al 1998;Strong and Fillery 2002), other studies have reported no significant effect of NO 3 ( addition on denitrification (Blackmer and Bremner 1978;De Klein and Van Logtestijn 1996). Denitrification has been reported to be limited by NO 3 ( when concentrations are lower than 5Á10 mg N kg…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mineral N addition increased both N 2 O emissions and total denitrification rates. In incubation studies, addition of NO 3 -has resulted either in an increase in denitrification rate ( Jordan et al, 1998;Strong and Fillery, 2002) or had no effect on denitrification rate (Myrold and Tiedje, 1985;, De Klein and van Logtestijn, 1996). Gillam et al (2008) concluded that NO 3 -addition affects denitrification rate only when NO 3 -is limiting the denitrification process, which can occur when the supply of NO 3 -is low or the demand for NO 3 -is high due to limited O 2 supply in combination with high availability of organic C. Nitrate addition increases N 2 O emissions in most cases through either an increase in the denitrification rate or through a change in the N 2 O molar ratio (Gillam et al, 2008).…”
Section: Effects Of Short-term Mineral Nitrogen Amendmentmentioning
confidence: 99%