2018
DOI: 10.3390/sym10070269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Denoising of Magnetocardiography Based on Improved Variational Mode Decomposition and Interval Thresholding Method

Abstract: Recently, magnetocardiography (MCG) has attracted increasing attention as a non-invasive and non-contact technique for detecting electrocardioelectric functions. However, the severe background noise makes it difficult to extract information. Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), which is an entirely non-recursive model, is used to decompose the non-stationary signal into the intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). Traditional VMD algorithms cannot control the bandwidth of each IMF, whose quadratic penalty lacks adapt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A low frequency (0.3 Hz) sinusoidal signal is used to simulate the baseline drift. [25] The MCG signal is a synthetic signal, [26] which does not contain noise. Baseline drift u[n] of different amplitudes is added to the MCG signal s[n], and the input signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is used to measure the magnitude of the baseline drift relative to the MCG signal.…”
Section: Baseline Drift Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low frequency (0.3 Hz) sinusoidal signal is used to simulate the baseline drift. [25] The MCG signal is a synthetic signal, [26] which does not contain noise. Baseline drift u[n] of different amplitudes is added to the MCG signal s[n], and the input signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is used to measure the magnitude of the baseline drift relative to the MCG signal.…”
Section: Baseline Drift Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, CEEMD decomposes signals recursively into IMFs and is suitable mainly for a multicomponent signal whose modes are well separated in the time-frequency plane. However, VMD is more robust and sensitive to sampling and noise [24], as it can handle a multicomponent signal whose mode is very close and can detect and distinguish small and large-scale fluctuations [30]. When VMD and CEEMD are combined with MFDFA, the two methods improved, as MFDFA classifies the IMFs; although, combining with VMD gives better results than CEEMD because of its good internal mechanism [31].…”
Section: Gnss Signal Decomposition With Vmdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some modified EMD methods have been proposed to inhibit mode mixing; unfortunately, they are all empirical methods. To overcome the influence of the parameter selection problem in VMD, some modified VMD methods are put forward, which are suitable for analyzing different kinds of signals, such as magnetocardiography (MCG) [17] and bearing signals [18]. The application of VMD in underwater acoustic field is very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%