2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Denoising of two-photon fluorescence images with Block-Matching 3D filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are well aware that understanding NM toxicity needs more comprehensive, complex, and novel multi- and interdisciplinary approaches [ 9 23 ]. These are driven in many cases by furthering imaging techniques through more specific labeling and detection of the cellular fate of NMs as illustrated by (i) in vitro/in vivo fluorescence ([ 22 , 24 ]; Figure 1 ), synchrotron radiation-based (SR) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) or X-ray fluorescence microscopy [ 25 ], or single photon emission computed tomography combined with X-ray computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging to study NM biodistribution at organ levels ( Figure 2 ); (ii) small-angle X-ray (SAXS; Figure 3 ) or neutron scattering [ 26 28 ], freeze-fracture combined transmission electron microscopy (FF-TEM) and sum-frequency generation (SFG) vibrational spectroscopy for determination of structure or membrane interactions of NMs [ 13 ], and in situ high-resolution TEM [ 29 ]; (iii) application of new sets of methodologies built on basic instrumentation and related expertise in combination with NM surface modifications and toxicity assaying. For example, alterations of dendrimers combined with high-resolution NMR, capillary electrophoresis, electrophysiology and computer-assisted modeling of membrane interactions [ 11 ] or the adjustment of chitosan-based NM combined with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), flow cytometry and near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence spectroscopy in vivo [ 22 ] may also be critical to rigorously characterize NM traits and relate them to nanotoxicity parameters to be assessed.…”
Section: Promoting Awareness On Nms Through Novel Approaches and Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are well aware that understanding NM toxicity needs more comprehensive, complex, and novel multi- and interdisciplinary approaches [ 9 23 ]. These are driven in many cases by furthering imaging techniques through more specific labeling and detection of the cellular fate of NMs as illustrated by (i) in vitro/in vivo fluorescence ([ 22 , 24 ]; Figure 1 ), synchrotron radiation-based (SR) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) or X-ray fluorescence microscopy [ 25 ], or single photon emission computed tomography combined with X-ray computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging to study NM biodistribution at organ levels ( Figure 2 ); (ii) small-angle X-ray (SAXS; Figure 3 ) or neutron scattering [ 26 28 ], freeze-fracture combined transmission electron microscopy (FF-TEM) and sum-frequency generation (SFG) vibrational spectroscopy for determination of structure or membrane interactions of NMs [ 13 ], and in situ high-resolution TEM [ 29 ]; (iii) application of new sets of methodologies built on basic instrumentation and related expertise in combination with NM surface modifications and toxicity assaying. For example, alterations of dendrimers combined with high-resolution NMR, capillary electrophoresis, electrophysiology and computer-assisted modeling of membrane interactions [ 11 ] or the adjustment of chitosan-based NM combined with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), flow cytometry and near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence spectroscopy in vivo [ 22 ] may also be critical to rigorously characterize NM traits and relate them to nanotoxicity parameters to be assessed.…”
Section: Promoting Awareness On Nms Through Novel Approaches and Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ca 2+ binding to calmodulin causes a conformational shift that changes the solvent exposure of the GFP and allows a fluorescence increase (Chen et al 2013). Earlier versions of GCaMP indicators had relatively low slow on-off kinetics and signal-to-noise ratio, which could however be improved by 3D Block-Matching filtering (Danielyan et al 2014). More recently, the development of the “ultrasensitive” GCaMP6 has improved neuronal event detection capability to single-spike resolution, though the off-kinetics remain somewhat slow (Chen et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtering methods already find widespread use in 2P-LSM in two stages: frame averaging that takes place at acquisition time (equivalent to a linear, low-pass filter) followed by post-acquisition Gaussian (linear, low-pass) or median (nonlinear) filtering [ 7 9 ]. More complex de-noising algorithms have outperformed temporal averaging for the specialized case of calcium fluxes in a single focal plane [ 10 , 11 ] but rely on parametric models of signal and noise and have not been shown to be effective for de-noising 3D volumes over which parameters may vary. Thus, filtering strategies that can make similar improvements and can be applied over three-dimensional volumes have great promise for improving performance in 2P-LSM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%