2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70010-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: an open-label, phase 2 study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
514
1
24

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 637 publications
(556 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
17
514
1
24
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the safety of denosumab and adverse events with higher doses (beginning with a 360-mg dose and then 120-mg monthly every 28 days), as used in treating patients with giant cell tumor of bone, has not been well defined. The effectiveness of denosumab regarding disease and symptom control in patients with an unresectable or recurrent giant cell tumor of bone has been seen, without severe adverse effects [22]; however, Thomas et al [22] reported, in a Phase 2 study, that the reason for two of their four patients discontinuing the denosumab regimen before completion of planned treatment was because of disease progression of a malignant giant cell tumor of bone. Additionally although five patients had serious adverse events, none were deemed to be treatmentrelated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the safety of denosumab and adverse events with higher doses (beginning with a 360-mg dose and then 120-mg monthly every 28 days), as used in treating patients with giant cell tumor of bone, has not been well defined. The effectiveness of denosumab regarding disease and symptom control in patients with an unresectable or recurrent giant cell tumor of bone has been seen, without severe adverse effects [22]; however, Thomas et al [22] reported, in a Phase 2 study, that the reason for two of their four patients discontinuing the denosumab regimen before completion of planned treatment was because of disease progression of a malignant giant cell tumor of bone. Additionally although five patients had serious adverse events, none were deemed to be treatmentrelated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the local aggressiveness of the tumor and the belief that a radical resection was not feasible, in May 2013 we decided to initiate treatment with denosumab as an adjuvant to avoid future recurrences. The administration began with a 360 mg subcutaneous dose, then 120 mg subcutaneously monthly (every 28 days) according to current FDA-approved protocol [22]. By October 2013, we observed clearly demarcated osteosclerosis of the recurrent mass located in the popliteal region (Fig.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Denosumab has been used with excellent results in the treatment of osteoporosis, skeletal metastases, and GCTs [8,15,18]. Concerns about patient safety with denosumab have also been answered by studies evaluating its side effects [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RANKL inhibition blocks osteoclast maturation and function [16], and denosumab has been successfully used in the treatment of osteoporosis [15] and skeletal metastases [8], and more recently in GCT therapy as well [18]. The satisfactory results with denosumab in the treatment of GCTs and the clear immunohistochemical similarity and relationship between GCTs and ABCs [19] justify the hypothesis that denosumab may also have positive effects on ABCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Our findings suggest that pharmacological inhibitors of osteoclast formation and activity may be useful in the treatment of ABC. It is possible that bisphosphonates and the anti-RANKL antibody denosumab, both of which have been used to treat GCTB, 26,27 may also be useful in inhibiting osteoclast formation and osteolysis in ABC. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%