2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-010-0169-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dense inclined flows of inelastic spheres: tests of an extension of kinetic theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
162
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
162
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that flows of thin layers of grains down an inclined surface exhibit a size effect whereby thinner layers require more tilt to begin flowing (50), and it is possible that the nonlocal fluidity approach justifies this behavior as a consequence of the lower boundary condition. Approaches based on kinetic theory have had success attributing this phenomenon to the effect of the bottom wall (27), which is encouraging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well known that flows of thin layers of grains down an inclined surface exhibit a size effect whereby thinner layers require more tilt to begin flowing (50), and it is possible that the nonlocal fluidity approach justifies this behavior as a consequence of the lower boundary condition. Approaches based on kinetic theory have had success attributing this phenomenon to the effect of the bottom wall (27), which is encouraging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Approaches include integral equations representing a self-activated process (23), theories of partial fluidization governed by a Ginzberg-Landau order parameter (24), Cosserat plasticity-based models (25), extensions of kinetic theory to the slow-flow regime (26,27), and the stochastic flow rule (28). Each of these models displays a "diffusive" character-although invoking different physical hypotheses, each accomplishes the essential qualitative goal of spreading sharply varying flow features on the basis of grain size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jenkins further extended the theory in [28] to very dissipative frictional particles, with a coefficient of restitution less than 0.7. Later, a detailed comparison with new experiments was performed, showing agreement for flows on low inclinations [25].…”
Section: Shallow-layer Modelsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We also make the assumption that plastic flow proceeds at constant volume, so that J p = det F p = 1, J = J e , and tr L p = trD p = 0. This is a standard assumption in the modeling of steady granular flow [32,25,33,34,4,14,15] and provides considerable simplification. This is equivalent to assuming that the material is always in its "critical state" [35], and all transient plastic volumetric dilatation or compaction (which is an important aspect of granular deformation [36,37]) has subsided.…”
Section: Summary Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%