2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-015-9460-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Densification contribution as a function of strain rate under indentation of terbium-doped aluminophosphate glass

Abstract: In this work, the strain rate effect on the deformation processes under Berkovich indentation of Tbdoped aluminophosphate glass has been investigated. It is shown that both densification and shear flow, adopted as main mechanisms of plastic deformation for oxide glasses, are strain rate sensitive. Moreover, the shear flow is assumed to be responsible for the strain rate sensitivity of densification. The densification contribution to the total plastic deformation is found to be greater for lower strain rate, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, it appears that ZIF glasses display a relatively typical behavior. Yet, the relatively low strain-rate sensitivity determined here for a g ZIF-62 compared to other glasses is in line with the trend for highly cross-linked networks and a small packing density of approximately 0.6 (Supporting Information 1), which deform mainly through compaction of the free volume. , This relationship can be understood qualitatively from the fact that purely displacive densification requires less thermal activation than shear flow, which involves the breaking and re-forming of bonds. , Further support for a densification-dominated plasticity stems from nanoindentation experiments that showed practically no pile-up …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In this context, it appears that ZIF glasses display a relatively typical behavior. Yet, the relatively low strain-rate sensitivity determined here for a g ZIF-62 compared to other glasses is in line with the trend for highly cross-linked networks and a small packing density of approximately 0.6 (Supporting Information 1), which deform mainly through compaction of the free volume. , This relationship can be understood qualitatively from the fact that purely displacive densification requires less thermal activation than shear flow, which involves the breaking and re-forming of bonds. , Further support for a densification-dominated plasticity stems from nanoindentation experiments that showed practically no pile-up …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Performing post indent annealing experiments, Shikimaka et al have shown that densification contribution to plastic flow is larger for small strain rates. At small strain rates, the material behaves softer and rearrangement processes in the material become easier (Shikimaka et al, 2016). That is why lower strain rates result in lower hardness values, which agrees very well with our results (Figure 3).…”
Section: The Effect Of Strain Rate On the Deformation Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In general, both processes, densification and shear flow are sensitive toward changes in strain rate (Shikimaka et al, 2016); the contribution of each, however, depends on composition, atomic packing density, and network connectivity (Yoshida et al, 2005;Limbach et al, 2014;Möncke et al, 2016). Shikimaka et al (2016) concluded densification to be triggered by shear and pressure.…”
Section: The Effect Of Strain Rate On the Deformation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increased values of hardness, Young’s modulus and fracture toughness of Bi, Pb-doped borophosphate glasses were reported [ 8 ] in comparison with the un-doped phosphate glasses [ 9 ] and rare-earth-doped phosphate glasses [ 10 ], due to the mixed glass former role of P 2 O 5 and B 2 O 3 components, which contribute to structural strengthening. The deformation of phosphate glasses under different load (strain) rates depends on the evolution of four mechanisms, namely, elastic deformation, densification, shear flow and fracture [ 11 ]. For reduced indentation loads, the first two mechanisms are prevalent, whereas shear flow and fracture are predominant for high-applied loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%