2023
DOI: 10.1177/20438206221144821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density and the compact city

Abstract: The ‘compact city’ agenda has become commonplace and is often presented as an urban ‘good’ in mainstream urban research, policy, and practice. Haarstad et al.'s intervention aims to bring critical geographical research to this debate, and is a very welcome one. In this response, I reflect on the debates on the compact city, consider its links to research on high density urbanisms, and present some questions for taking this critical urban debate forward.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Neuman [58] points to the spurious definitions of sustainability throughout the literature and, indeed, the ability of built-form outcomes to deliver on all fronts. Haarstad et al [60] and McFarlane [61], though acknowledging that future cities will be compact, raise a host of issues such as overcrowding, gentrification, and ecological outcomes of compactness, which have been poorly addressed, pointing to compact cities as being an ideological agenda flowing from institutional neoliberal hegemony, which actually generates inequities and is largely resisted for fear of outpricing, congestion, and infrastructural overuse [24]. This last point speaks to the paradox of the compact agenda, which is firstly paradoxical due to its promotion of the very issues that led to the rise of urban planning in the first place, i.e., overcrowding, noise, and pollution [57], and secondly because quality of life, across social, economic, and sustainability factors, may actually be higher in the suburbs.…”
Section: Tensions Of Compactnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Neuman [58] points to the spurious definitions of sustainability throughout the literature and, indeed, the ability of built-form outcomes to deliver on all fronts. Haarstad et al [60] and McFarlane [61], though acknowledging that future cities will be compact, raise a host of issues such as overcrowding, gentrification, and ecological outcomes of compactness, which have been poorly addressed, pointing to compact cities as being an ideological agenda flowing from institutional neoliberal hegemony, which actually generates inequities and is largely resisted for fear of outpricing, congestion, and infrastructural overuse [24]. This last point speaks to the paradox of the compact agenda, which is firstly paradoxical due to its promotion of the very issues that led to the rise of urban planning in the first place, i.e., overcrowding, noise, and pollution [57], and secondly because quality of life, across social, economic, and sustainability factors, may actually be higher in the suburbs.…”
Section: Tensions Of Compactnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commentaries illustrate that a ‘diversified’ agenda is not simply about bringing in a wider range of perspectives, but also about engaging with a wider range of contexts, conditions, and histories of compact urban spaces. As McFarlane (2023) writes in his commentary, ‘paying attention to how compactness is lived’ is a better starting point ‘than the technical projects of planners or academics’. He illustrates the diversity of contexts in which compact and dense urban spaces are experienced.…”
Section: Contexts Practices and Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reports and policy papers have argued that the compact city model has positive effects on transportation efficiency, local economy, citizen health, social cohesion, and cultural dynamics since the European Union Green Paper on the Urban Environment (EC, 1990) (OECD, 2012;UN-Habitat, 2017;EC, 2017). The model is presented almost as a straightforward positive phenomenon, and critical debate on compact cities is rare and scarce (McFarlane, 2023). Compactness, density, diversity, mixed land use, efficient transportation, and abundant green space are the compact city's core planning strategies for achieving sustainability (Bibri, 2020;Bibri et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%