Although intravenous chlorpheniramine can cause bronchodilatation, oral and parenteral antihistamines have not proved useful in treating asthma. Inhaled antihistamines may cause throat irritation, but a recent study of the antihistamine, clemastine, showed it to be an effective bronchodilator without irritant effects. We have extended these studies to determine the site of action of inhaled clemastine and to assess its potential usefulness both as a bronchodilator and as a maintenance treatment. Eleven stable asthmatic patients received inhaled clemastine and placebo and the effect was assessed by serial maximum expiratory flow volume (MEFV) curves breathing air and a helium/oxygen (He/02) mixture. There was no significant improvement in peak flow rates during air breathing after clemastine and no significant difference between the responses to drug and placebo. Minor but significant changes were seen in some flow measurements on the downslope of the MEFV curve during air and He/02 breathing, and these are tentatively ascribed to a dilating effect of clemastine on peripheral airways where flow is laminar. Subsequent administration of inhaled isoprenaline showed the patients to be still capable of significant bronchodilatation. The addition of clemastine, from a pressurised aerosol, to the patients' therapeutic regimen for two weeks was no more effective than placebo in controlling airflow obstruction, and did not reduce the need for standard bronchodilators. In our patients clemastine was not a clinically useful bronchodilator either acutely or as a maintenance treatment for asthma.In asthmatic patients the bronchial smooth muscle is hyperreactive to histamine released by allergic reactions, but oral and parenteral antihistamine have not proved useful in treating asthma, although intravenous chlorpheniramine can produce bronchodilatation (Popa, 1977). Aerosols of antihistamine may cause throat irritation, but a recent study of the H1-receptor blocking antihistamine, clemastine, showed it to have no irritant effects when inhaled. In a double-blind study 12 patients (six atopic) who had recovered from acute severe asthma were given 1 ml clemastine 005% in saline, salbutamol 0 05%, or physiological saline by aerosol inhalation. Both clemastine and salbutamol caused significant bronchodilatation, and there was no significant difference between them. Subsequent work (Nogrady and Bevan, 1 978) has confirmed that the bronchodilator properties of clemastine are not related to any anticholinergic action.We have extended these studies to determine the site of action of inhaled clemastine and to assess its potency, both acutely and as a maintenance treatment.
Methods
NORMAL SUBJECTSThree normal subjects inhaled 0f2 mg clemastine or physiological saline placebo from a pressurised aerosol and had serial measurements of airways resistance and total lung capacity measured in the body plethysmograph for two hours after administration of drug or placebo. A further six normal subjects performed MEFV curves breathing air...