2020
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density-dependent condition of juvenile penaeid shrimps in seagrass-dominated aquatic vegetation beds located at different distance from a tidal inlet

Abstract: Seagrasses are critical habitats for the recruitment and growth of juvenile penaeid shrimps within estuaries and coastal lagoons. The location of a seagrass bed within the lagoon can determine the value of a particular bed for shrimp populations. Consequently, differences in the abundance of shrimp can be found in seagrasses depending on their location. As shrimp density increases, density-dependent effects on biological parameters are more likely to occur. However, knowledge about density-dependent processes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study established, by extrapolating the relationship between stocking density and final biomass, that the density‐dependent effect on growth and survival of longarm river prawns was at a maximum at 600 prawns/m 3 during the nursery phase. This process occurred when growth rates were regulated by the stocking density (Blanco‐Martínez et al 2020). In the grow‐out phase, 30 prawns/m 2 were determined by Lopez ‐Uriostegui et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study established, by extrapolating the relationship between stocking density and final biomass, that the density‐dependent effect on growth and survival of longarm river prawns was at a maximum at 600 prawns/m 3 during the nursery phase. This process occurred when growth rates were regulated by the stocking density (Blanco‐Martínez et al 2020). In the grow‐out phase, 30 prawns/m 2 were determined by Lopez ‐Uriostegui et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%