2002
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density-dependent growth as a key mechanism in the regulation of fish populations: evidence from among-population comparisons

Abstract: It is generally assumed that fish populations are regulated primarily in the juvenile (pre-recruit) phase of the life cycle, although density dependence in growth and reproductive parameters within the recruited phase has been widely reported. Here we present evidence to suggest that density-dependent growth in the recruited phase is a key process in the regulation of many fish populations. We analyse 16 fish populations with long-term records of size-at-age and biomass data, and detect significant density-dep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
363
4
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 409 publications
(395 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
25
363
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, fisheries‐induced evolution can be buffered by negative density dependence in somatic growth rate that is the outcome of intraspecific competition for limiting resources (Dunlop et al., 2015; Gobin et al., 2016). On the one hand, Healey (1980) provides experimental evidence of fisheries‐induced, negative density‐dependent growth at the whole lake level in small lakes, and Lorenzen and Enberg (2002) discuss more generally the importance of considering negative density‐dependent growth as a population regulation mechanism in fish populations. On the other hand, Gobin et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, fisheries‐induced evolution can be buffered by negative density dependence in somatic growth rate that is the outcome of intraspecific competition for limiting resources (Dunlop et al., 2015; Gobin et al., 2016). On the one hand, Healey (1980) provides experimental evidence of fisheries‐induced, negative density‐dependent growth at the whole lake level in small lakes, and Lorenzen and Enberg (2002) discuss more generally the importance of considering negative density‐dependent growth as a population regulation mechanism in fish populations. On the other hand, Gobin et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This uncertainty is attributable to the role that fishing plays in density-dependent population regulation (Shepherd and Cushing 1980;Myers 1995;Lorenzen and Enberg 2002), and whether F ? M is sufficiently high to override natural population regulators such as habitat limitation.…”
Section: Fishing and Its Effect On Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlation coefficients of various population indices of sand shiner sampled from 15 populations in non-wadeable rivers in Iowa, 2007 -2008. Indices include catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE = number of fish1100 m trawling), mean back-calculated length at age 1 (BCI), mean back-calculated length at age 2 (BC2), mean back-calculated length at age 3 (BC3), total annual mortality (A), age-specific mortality between age 1 and age 2 (A1-z), age-specific mortality between age 2 and age 3 (Az-3), and recruitment variability index (RVI Lorenzen and Enberg 2002), particularly for juvenile fishes (Post et al 1999). While studies on density-dependent growth in sand shiner populations are unavailable, there is evidence that density-dependent interactions may be important for small-bodied cyprinids in the Great Plains.…”
Section: Data Anafysismentioning
confidence: 99%