1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02147934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density-dependent habitat selection: Testing the theory with fitness data

Abstract: SummaryAccording to density-dependent habitat selection theory, reproductive success should decline with increased density. Fitness should be similar between habitats if habitat selection follows an ideal free distribution; fitness should be dissimilar between habitats if habitat selection is modified by territorial behavior. I tested these assumptions by examining a variety of fitness estimates obtained from white-footed mice living in nest boxes in forest, forest edge and fencerow habitats in southwestern On… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
144
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
144
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose that the D. antillarum distribution patterns observed in this study, when combined with temporal data ( Van der Hal, 2005;Debrot and Nagelkerken, 2006), and observed differences in ecosystem characteristics between habitat types, are in line with expectations from the theory of density-dependent habitat selection (see Fretwell and Lucas, 1969;Fretwell, 1972;Morris, 1989;Shepherd and Litvak, 2004). Our data elucidate potential mechanisms by which sheltered, lagoon, and backreef habitats confer higher levels of fitness on D. antillarum than forereefs.…”
Section: Evidence For Density-dependent Habitat Selectionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We propose that the D. antillarum distribution patterns observed in this study, when combined with temporal data ( Van der Hal, 2005;Debrot and Nagelkerken, 2006), and observed differences in ecosystem characteristics between habitat types, are in line with expectations from the theory of density-dependent habitat selection (see Fretwell and Lucas, 1969;Fretwell, 1972;Morris, 1989;Shepherd and Litvak, 2004). Our data elucidate potential mechanisms by which sheltered, lagoon, and backreef habitats confer higher levels of fitness on D. antillarum than forereefs.…”
Section: Evidence For Density-dependent Habitat Selectionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Los costos y beneficios de dispersión varían en el tiempo y en el espacio entre los individuos de cada especie (Bowler and Benton 2005). El principal beneficio es evitar la competencia intraespecífica en el sitio actual y ocupar hábitats subexplotados, mientras que el principal costo es la mortalidad durante ese movimiento dispersivo (Morris 1989(Morris , 1991. En consecuencia, el balance será reflejado en el éxito reproductivo individual en respuesta a la decisión de dispersarse (Moenting and Morris 2006).…”
Section: Mj Monteverde and K Hodaraunclassified
“…We thus expect habitat selection to be densitydependent (Rosenzweig 1981;Morris 1989). Under density dependence, animals select habitats based on the intrinsic quality (perceived) of the habitat, yet experience realized fitness that is lower because of competition with conspecifics.…”
Section: Habitat Habitat Use and Habitat Selection (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%