2008
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arn102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density-dependent mating tactic expression is linked to stress hormone in Woodhouse's toad

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is in contrast to the fact that intragroup agonism was negatively related to fGC levels at Anja, suggesting that between-group territory defense may be a more important predictor of social stress than competition among members of the same group in these lemurs. A similar positive relationship between GC levels and population density has been reported for other free-living mammalian species (Novikov & Moshkin, 1998;de Waal, Aureli & Judge, 2000;Harper & Austad, 2004), as well as for birds (Silverin, 1998;Love et al, 2008), amphibians (Leary, Garcia & Knapp, 2008), reptiles (Jessop, Limpus & Whittier, 1999), and fish (Barton & Iwama, 1991). For groupliving animals, the intensity or unpredictability of social pressures that would be expected under unnaturally crowded conditions may elevate a physiological mediator to the range of Reactive Homeostasis (Goymann & Wingfield, 2004;Wingfield, 2005;Romero et al, 2009;Rubenstein & Shen, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The latter is in contrast to the fact that intragroup agonism was negatively related to fGC levels at Anja, suggesting that between-group territory defense may be a more important predictor of social stress than competition among members of the same group in these lemurs. A similar positive relationship between GC levels and population density has been reported for other free-living mammalian species (Novikov & Moshkin, 1998;de Waal, Aureli & Judge, 2000;Harper & Austad, 2004), as well as for birds (Silverin, 1998;Love et al, 2008), amphibians (Leary, Garcia & Knapp, 2008), reptiles (Jessop, Limpus & Whittier, 1999), and fish (Barton & Iwama, 1991). For groupliving animals, the intensity or unpredictability of social pressures that would be expected under unnaturally crowded conditions may elevate a physiological mediator to the range of Reactive Homeostasis (Goymann & Wingfield, 2004;Wingfield, 2005;Romero et al, 2009;Rubenstein & Shen, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Some studies in amphibians and reptiles also support the positive relationship between population or breeding density and stress axis activity. For example, increased population density during mating in anurans (Leary, Garcia & Knapp 2008) or nesting density in turtles (Jessop, Limpus & Whittier 1999) is associated with increased plasma glucocorticoids. High population density either were associated with increased or decreased plasma glucocorticoids in female side-blotched lizards (Uta stansburiana) depending upon the female reproductive tactic (Comendant et al 2003).…”
Section: F a C T O R S A F F E C T I N G A C T I V I T Y O F T H E H mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Peltophryne florentinoi the dominant frequency was the most stereotyped acoustic feature examined (static), and we therefore suggest that this feature of the call may be relevant in terms of the female preference and also could mediate male-male interactions. On the other hand, temporal properties such as call duration in P. florentinoi (>10 s) could be influenced strongly by social context, such as the density of calling males, and probably is under strong energetic constraints, as has been reported for other species of anurans (Ryan, 1988;Wells, 1988;Wells and Taigen, 1992;Giacoma and Castellano, 2001;Leary, Garcia and Knapp, 2008). Generally, low within-male variability is subject to stabilizing or weakly directional selection, and that the high variability of dynamic properties is subject to highly directional selection (See fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%