2017
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2017-0129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density-dependent woody detritus accumulation in an even-aged, single-species forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding snag and wood dynamics is critically important for evaluating the tradeoffs and effects of possible post-fire management actions such as salvage logging or reforestation planting on a host of key concerns (Graham et al 1994), including future wildfire potential (Johnson et al 2020), wildlife habitat conservation and development (Schaedel et al 2017), distribution of shrubs and forbs (Halpern and Lutz 2013), forest recruitment, forest carbon sequestration, and CO 2 emissions from fire (Stenzel et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Understanding snag and wood dynamics is critically important for evaluating the tradeoffs and effects of possible post-fire management actions such as salvage logging or reforestation planting on a host of key concerns (Graham et al 1994), including future wildfire potential (Johnson et al 2020), wildlife habitat conservation and development (Schaedel et al 2017), distribution of shrubs and forbs (Halpern and Lutz 2013), forest recruitment, forest carbon sequestration, and CO 2 emissions from fire (Stenzel et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true regarding carbon stored in large-diameter trees, where the majority of aboveground forest carbon is found (Stephenson et al 2014. For example, 62 years after clear-cut harvest and broadcast burning, large-diameter legacy wood originating from the preharvest stand still accounted for 45% of aboveground woody detritus stocks in a long-term replicated forest development experiment (Schaedel et al 2017). While newly created snags and fallen surface fuels will burn during future fires, any pieces that are not completely consumed will become charred, which can increase the carbon residence in these systems (DeLuca et al 2008, Brewer et al 2013, Santin et al 2015, Ward et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large woody debris takes longer to decay than smaller debris (Yin 1999) and at the same time wood that has burned but not fully combusted is coated in charcoal, which makes the wood more resistant to decay (Maestrini et al 2017). In one experiment, large-diameter dead wood accounted for 45% of AGC, 62 years after fire (Schaedel et al 2017), which means that residual dead wood can continue to store carbon, slowly releasing it to soil and atmospheric pools over decades, potentially centuries (Maestrini et al 2017, Lutz et al 2020, while the surrounding ecosystem regenerates and starts to ramp up carbon sequestration. This means that disallowing the removal of large-diameter standing live and dead standing trees in post-fire areas is an important step that land managers can take to meeting landscape carbon storage objectives (Lindenmayer et al 2008, Mildrexler et al 2020.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%