2006
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/29/1/023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density functional calculation of work function using charged slab systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the conventional method, the work function could be calculated as u ¼ V(1) À E F , where V(1) and E F are the electrostatic potential in a vacuum region far from the neutral surface and the Fermi energy of the neutral surface system, respectively. 17 BiNbO 4 has orthorhombic structure with Pnna space group at ambient conditions. The calculated lattice parameters a ¼ 5.68 Å , b ¼ 11.72 Å , and c ¼ 4.98 Å are in good agreement with the available experimental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the conventional method, the work function could be calculated as u ¼ V(1) À E F , where V(1) and E F are the electrostatic potential in a vacuum region far from the neutral surface and the Fermi energy of the neutral surface system, respectively. 17 BiNbO 4 has orthorhombic structure with Pnna space group at ambient conditions. The calculated lattice parameters a ¼ 5.68 Å , b ¼ 11.72 Å , and c ¼ 4.98 Å are in good agreement with the available experimental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van der Waals correction of the Grimme’s D2 scheme 66 was considered to compute the non-covalent interaction of multilayer CTFs. The work function was calculated by: φ = V( ∞ ) − E F , where V( ∞ ) and E F are the electrostatic potential in a vacuum region far from the neutral surface and the Fermi energy of the neutral surface system, respectively 67 . The vacuum level was taken as the reference in the calculations of band alignment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5.1] [ 56 ] but without referring to the charge quantities as derived from basic calculation [ 13 ]. In the original paper written a decade ago, a simple extrapolative formula was used to calculate the chemical potential change without assuming the Faraday result of the accumulation of charge at the surface only which might be seen as a means of minimizing the free energy of the system; specialists have assumed constant chemical potential in the bulk of the lattice and assumed “infinite” lattices and canceling image charges to compute surface electronic properties [ 57 ] but the assumptions used in these methods may not be very correct, according to some other interpretations [ 58 ]. The charge build up at the surface is a net and not instantaneous experimental result as deduced by Faraday in his very elegant ice pail and other macroscopic experiments where care must be exercised in extrapolation to smaller size and dimensions, and also different geometries.…”
Section: Epiloguementioning
confidence: 99%