2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-1280(00)00441-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density functional study of a model amide. Prediction of formamide geometry, dipole moment, IR harmonic vibration ν CO and GIAO NMR shieldings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, using DFT and MP2 methodology combined with basis sets containing (or lacking) polarization and diffuse functions [73], we also noticed the impact of a basis set on the predicted planarity/pyramidalization of NH 2 group in free formamide molecule. It is apparent in the current study from Table 1 that, in contrast to B3LYP, the M06-2X calculations with basis sets containing polarization and diffuse functions are capable of predicting a nonplanar structure of the ZnPc complex in a polar environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For example, using DFT and MP2 methodology combined with basis sets containing (or lacking) polarization and diffuse functions [73], we also noticed the impact of a basis set on the predicted planarity/pyramidalization of NH 2 group in free formamide molecule. It is apparent in the current study from Table 1 that, in contrast to B3LYP, the M06-2X calculations with basis sets containing polarization and diffuse functions are capable of predicting a nonplanar structure of the ZnPc complex in a polar environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As we have used the gaseous geometry of formamide this disagreement may originate from the possible existence of nonplanar conformation. The pyramidal arrangement of NH 2 group has been the subject of theoretical 71, 72 and experimental 73 debates but the nonplanar arrangement has not been excluded. The HTCH/B3LYP and B97–1 functionals produce values about 4.3–4.6%/7.8% and 7.4% higher than experiment, while the MP2, CCSD and CCSD(T) schemes give dipole moments that are about 5.2, 7.6, and 6.0% larger.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning here that in the literature, several examples are found for variation of dipole moments from the experimental results depending on the quantum chemical method used. It is stated [62], "it should be stressed that the RHF values are better than the MP2 ones but worse than the corresponding DFT results." It is also observed that dipole moment value in 6-31G basis set is overestimated for several systems [63].…”
Section: Estimation Of Dipole Moment Experimentally and Theoreticallymentioning
confidence: 95%