2005
DOI: 10.1021/jp0466901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density Functional Theory Predictions of Isotropic Hyperfine Coupling Constants

Abstract: The reliability of density functional theory (DFT) in the determination of the isotropic hyperfine coupling constants (hfccs) of the ground electronic states of organic and inorganic radicals is examined. Predictions using several DFT methods and 6-31G, TZVP, EPR-III and cc-pVQZ basis sets are made and compared to experimental values. The set of 75 radicals here studied was selected using a wide range of criteria. The systems studied are neutral, cationic, anionic; doublet, triplet, quartet; localized, and con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
106
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
10
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, following our previous work, 30 the equilibrium and effective geometries as well as force fields at these geometries have been determined using the B3LYP exchange-correlation functional [38][39][40][41] and the TZV2P basis set, 42 and computations of the isotropic HFCCs and their second derivatives with respect to normal modes have been done using the DFT-RU approach [35][36][37] (numerical differentiation step size has been set to 0.0075 a.u.). In the carbon HFCCs calculations, we also employed the B3LYP exchange-correlation functional, [38][39][40][41] which is typically recommended for computation of HFCCs of radicals, 15,17 and the Huz-IIIsu3 basis set, [43][44][45][46] which is tailored for evaluation of HFCCs. To validate our choice of exchange-correlation functional and basis set for carbon HFCCs, we tested the performance of our methodology on a single carbon atom in its 3 P ground state.…”
Section: Theory and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, following our previous work, 30 the equilibrium and effective geometries as well as force fields at these geometries have been determined using the B3LYP exchange-correlation functional [38][39][40][41] and the TZV2P basis set, 42 and computations of the isotropic HFCCs and their second derivatives with respect to normal modes have been done using the DFT-RU approach [35][36][37] (numerical differentiation step size has been set to 0.0075 a.u.). In the carbon HFCCs calculations, we also employed the B3LYP exchange-correlation functional, [38][39][40][41] which is typically recommended for computation of HFCCs of radicals, 15,17 and the Huz-IIIsu3 basis set, [43][44][45][46] which is tailored for evaluation of HFCCs. To validate our choice of exchange-correlation functional and basis set for carbon HFCCs, we tested the performance of our methodology on a single carbon atom in its 3 P ground state.…”
Section: Theory and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The lack of such analysis tools forced early investigations of EPR data to rely on rules-of-thumb or simple principles that relate the spin density to the measured hyperfine coupling constants (HFCCs). One such relation is the McConnell relation that states that the spin density ρ C on the carbon of a C-H fragment in an organic π radical is linearly dependent on the isotropic hyperfine constant of hydrogen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of models 1′-4′, the positions of heavy atoms assigned in the electron density maps from the crystal structure, were frozen during the geometry optimization and only the positions of the H-atoms were allowed to vary. RMSD's between the heavy atoms of the geometry-optimized structures (models 1 -4) and the corresponding X-ray coordinates (models 1′ -4′) were obtained by overlaying the structures and employing a simulated annealing algorithm (26) to minimize the differences in atomic coordinates.Single-point calculations were then performed on the optimized structures using the B3LYP hybrid functional in combination with the DFT-optimized valence triple-ζ basis, TZVP, which has been shown to give accurate estimates for hyperfine parameters of nuclei from the first three rows of the periodic table (27,28). Estimates of the g-tensors of each model were obtained from single-point calculations with the ORCA 2.4-41 software package using the same B3LYP/ TZVP scheme (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 It can be measured experimentally or determined by standard ab initio methods. 22, 23 The second, Π(0), appears in the Maclaurin expansion of the spherically averaged momentum density 24 and can be obtained from high-energy electron impact experiments 25 or ab initio calculations. 26,27 The origin posmom density S(0) is also important, for it directly measures the probability of circular electronic trajectories.…”
Section: The Special Value S )mentioning
confidence: 99%