2012
DOI: 10.1002/mrc.2837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density functional theory study of 13C NMR chemical shift of chlorinated compounds

Abstract: The use of the standard density functional theory (DFT) leads to an overestimation of the paramagnetic contribution and underestimation of the shielding constants, especially for chlorinated carbon nuclei. For that reason, the predictions of chlorinated compounds often yield too high chemical shift values. In this study, the WC04 functional is shown to be capable of reducing the overestimation of the chemical shift of Cl-bonded carbons in standard DFT functionals and to show a good performance in the predictio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were also significant disparities between the observed and the DFT‐calculated carbon chemical shifts for the 14‐position and the methyl ester carbonyl. Only when we used a DFT functional specifically optimized for the calculation of carbon NMR chemical shifts in chlorinated compounds (WC04) was the accuracy of the quantum mechanical calculations of the C3 and C4 carbon shifts high enough to suggest structure 2 over 1 (Table ). Root mean square deviations for the C3 and C4 carbon chemical shifts (RMSD {2}) were 2.8 ppm for 2 and 20.6 ppm for 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were also significant disparities between the observed and the DFT‐calculated carbon chemical shifts for the 14‐position and the methyl ester carbonyl. Only when we used a DFT functional specifically optimized for the calculation of carbon NMR chemical shifts in chlorinated compounds (WC04) was the accuracy of the quantum mechanical calculations of the C3 and C4 carbon shifts high enough to suggest structure 2 over 1 (Table ). Root mean square deviations for the C3 and C4 carbon chemical shifts (RMSD {2}) were 2.8 ppm for 2 and 20.6 ppm for 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy‐minimized conformers for compounds 1–3 were generated by the Dreiding force field in MarvinSketch (optimization limit = normal, diversity limit = 0.1) regardless of rotations of methyl and hydroxyl groups, the geometries of which were further optimized using density function theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6‐31 G(d) level in acetone . The optimized conformers were subjected to 13 C NMR calculations using the gauge‐independent atomic orbital (GIAO) method at the B3LYP/6‐31 + G(d,p) level in acetone with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as a reference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have removed the hexafluoro, hexachloro, and hexabromo derivatives 9 , 10 , and 11 because atoms directly linked to halogen atoms cannot be properly calculated at the GIAO/B3LYP/6‐311++G(d,p) level, the error increasing with the atomic number, so fluorine is acceptable, chlorine is bad, and bromine and iodine are very bad …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have removed the hexafluoro, hexachloro, and hexabromo derivatives 9, 10, and 11 because atoms directly linked to halogen atoms cannot be properly calculated at the GIAO/B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level, the error increasing with the atomic number, so fluorine is acceptable, chlorine is bad, and bromine and iodine are very bad. [21][22][23] For compound 9 [(NPF 2 ) 3 ], a regression of σ vs. experimental δ (σ GIAO = (318.78 ± 2.58) − (1.241 ± 0.027)*δ exp , n = 6, R 2 = 0.998, RMS residual = 4.7 ppm, Equation 6) shows that instead of 284.1 ppm (Table 1), the experimental value corresponds to a calculated σ = 301.5 ppm. The effect, −17.4 ppm for two fluorine atoms, corresponds to −8.7 ppm for each 31 P- 19 F bond.…”
Section: P Chemical Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%