A density functional theory/time-depended density functional theory was used to investigate a series of heteroleptic Ir(III) complexes (1-4) employing azadipyrromethene and closely related dipyrromethene derivatives as N^N ancillary ligands, in an effort to explore the underlying reasons of non-radiative behaviour of 1 and further adjust the photophysical properties by the modification of N^N ancillary ligands. The results reveal that the non-emissive phenomenon of 1 can be attributed to the weak 3 ILCT character of the emissive excited state and large structure distortion, as well as the small T opt 1 -S opt 0 energy gap. Upon tailoring the N^N ancillary ligands, the geometry distortion of 2-4 becomes obviously smaller in comparison with 1, accordingly, the spectrum properties are also markedly affected.For instance, the enlargement of frontier molecular orbital energy gaps from 1 to 4 results in the blueshift of their absorption and emission spectra, which is considered to be dominated by the ancillary ligand, while there is a little contribution from the Ir(III) center. Importantly, further analysis on the quantum yield (F PL ) of these complexes also indicates a vital role of N^N ancillary ligands. It is intriguing to note that the designed complex 4 without pendant phenyl rings substituent in the ancillary ligand, possesses an efficient indirect spin-orbital coupling route, larger transition electric dipole moment (m S3 ), higher T opt 1 -S opt 0 energy gap and smaller S 3 -T 1 splitting energy (DE (S3-T1) ), which ensure its higher F PL compared to other complexes. Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Tables (S1) Optimized geometrical parameters for 1 in the ground state at different functional levels with experimental data. (S2) Calculated absorption spectra of 1 in CHCl 3 media with different functionals. (S3) Variations of geometry parameters from S 0 to T 1 state for 1-4. (S4) Calculated intramolecular centroid-centroid distances for 1-3. (S5) Molecular orbital compositions (%) of 1-4 in the ground state. (S6) Calculated singlet excited states in detail for 1-4. (S7-S8) The 5d(Ir) orbital compositions (%) in the T 1 state and the electronic transition of S n states based on the T 1 geometries of 2-4. (S9) The net spin values located on Ir(III) of 3 MLCT and 3 MC states for 1-4. (S10) Cartesian coordinates of 1 at the S 0 and T 1 optimized geometry. Fig. (S1) The synthetic routes of the designed ancillary ligands L1-L3. (S2) Optimized structures of 1-4 in the ground state. (S3) Orbital interaction diagram for 1. (S4) Calculated spin-density distributions for the 3 MC states. (S5) Energy level diagram of 3 MLCT/pp* and 3 MC excited states for 1-4 with the normalized S 0 levels. See