2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.08.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density of grain boundaries and plasticity size effects: A discrete dislocation dynamics study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bauschinger strain B remains low for pancakelike grains with small AR, whereas it attains 20% or more of the yield strain when the grains are equiaxed or even needlelike ͑ARտ 1͒. These observations link-up with findings in previous DDP studies of thin films under tension 4,9 that needlelike grains exhibit a high hardening rate due to the development of dislocation pile-ups against GBs. These pile-ups are responsible for the storage of energy, which assists reverse plastic deformation during unloading.…”
Section: A Predicted Besupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Bauschinger strain B remains low for pancakelike grains with small AR, whereas it attains 20% or more of the yield strain when the grains are equiaxed or even needlelike ͑ARտ 1͒. These observations link-up with findings in previous DDP studies of thin films under tension 4,9 that needlelike grains exhibit a high hardening rate due to the development of dislocation pile-ups against GBs. These pile-ups are responsible for the storage of energy, which assists reverse plastic deformation during unloading.…”
Section: A Predicted Besupporting
confidence: 78%
“…16͑a͒ by plotting B as a function of the density of GBs ͑defined as From this figure, two observations are made. First, the correlation between B and GB ͑n͒ is not as good as that between yield strength and GB density as reported by Kumar et al 9 The data for single-layer films, in fact, do not even reveal a trend. The latter can be attributed to the fact that for n =1 the GB density parameter lacks any information about the film thickness and thus makes it hard to compare films with different thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This is partly due to increase in grain coarsening which leads to an increase in the grain boundary area which increases the amount of energy required for the movement of dislocations required to cause fracture [34][35][36] . Thus, the material can withstand a higher plastic deformation before the final fracture.…”
Section: µMmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same reasons, one would expect climb to be more prominent when the grain size is smaller or the density of dislocation sources is reduced. 12,13 In our 2D simulations, dislocation sources and obstacles are regarded as static entities, while in reality they evolve as the dislocation structure changes. Any effects due to the curvature of the dislocations are also not taken into account.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the two-dimensional formulation clearly cannot capture all of the physics, it allows for the modeling of realistic numbers of dislocations and microstructures, and it has been quite successful at simulating the behavior of thin films over a range of microstructures. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Most previous DDD studies [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] have been limited to low temperatures. Since diffusion of point defects is negligible at low temperatures, the movement of dislocations is limited to glide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%