1990
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90360-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density of trunk tissues of young and medium age people

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tissue densities of 1.178 g/cm 3 for muscle, 1.705 g/cm 3 for bone, 1.158 g/cm 3 for liver, and 0.563 g/cm 3 for lung tissue (Erdmann and Gos, 1990; Martin et al, 1989) were used to calculated segment masses. Adipose tissue density was approximated as 0.947 g/cm 3 , which was an average of the densities of the colon, off-peritoneum, and subcutaneous adipose tissue (Erdmann and Gos, 1990). All other tissues were defined as lean tissue with a density of 1.138 g/cm 3 , which was an average of densities for blood, vasculature, tendon, stomach, intestines, and heart (Erdmann and Gos, 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissue densities of 1.178 g/cm 3 for muscle, 1.705 g/cm 3 for bone, 1.158 g/cm 3 for liver, and 0.563 g/cm 3 for lung tissue (Erdmann and Gos, 1990; Martin et al, 1989) were used to calculated segment masses. Adipose tissue density was approximated as 0.947 g/cm 3 , which was an average of the densities of the colon, off-peritoneum, and subcutaneous adipose tissue (Erdmann and Gos, 1990). All other tissues were defined as lean tissue with a density of 1.138 g/cm 3 , which was an average of densities for blood, vasculature, tendon, stomach, intestines, and heart (Erdmann and Gos, 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We created the FDTD model of subject 1 by modifying the model used in previous calculations [14]: the thickness of skin was decreased to be more realistic. The model of subject 2 was newly created by segmenting the images of the female cadaver from the National Libraries of Medicine's Visible Human Project and then assigning appropriate electric conductivity, electric permittivity, and mass density to each tissue at each frequency [14,[20][21][22][23][24], The values of these properties for all the tissue types (33 for the male and 36 for the female) are listed in Table 1. The resolution of the final FDTD meshes is 5 mm in all three dimensions, which has been shown to be adequate for SAR calculations in a head model at 64 MHz [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason for this over-estimation is the change in thorax density between cadavers (Dempster Uniform Density Method) and living population (Personalized and Improved Uniform Density Method) due to the lung tissue. Reported lung densities on cadavers ranged from 0.563 g/cm 3 (Erdmann and Gos, 1990) to 1.050 g/cm 3 (Woodard and White, 1986) while in vivo measures were found to be 0.254 g/cm 3 during expiration (Kohda and Shigematsu, 1989) and the mean lung density used for the Personalized method was 0.28 g/cm 3 . Therefore, in vivo density of the thorax computed with the Personalized Method was in average lower than the density calculated by Dempster (Dempster, 1955) and used in the Dempster Uniform Density Method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Densities for each thorax tissues and segment have been well documented in the literature (Dempster, 1955;Erdmann and Gos, 1990;Hayashi et al, 2011;Li et al, 2010). The aim of this study was to combine those existing data to propose a new estimation of the thorax density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%