2004
DOI: 10.1021/je034260i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density of Water + Carbon Dioxide at Elevated Pressures:  Measurements and Correlation

Abstract: Density data of the water + carbon dioxide system were determined using a calibrated vibrating tube mass flow meter with a uncertainty below 0.15%. Measurements were performed in the pressure and temperature regimes (1 to 30) MPa and (284 to 332) K, respectively. The water-rich phase density showed a pronounced dependence on pressure and temperature whereas the CO 2 -rich phase density did not change from the pure density within the measuring uncertainty. A regression function was developed which describes the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
108
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
14
108
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6(b) shows how data available in the literature for the aqueous phase densities of the CO2 + H2O binary compare with the new data, as well as densities calculated using the EOS-CG of Gernert and Span [32]. The new data extend, and are consistent with, the data sets reported by Hebach et al [7], Yan et al [25] and Yaginuma et al [11], which have a similar degree of scatter to the current work. In contrast, the data of Chiquet et al [9] have relative deviations of as much as -1.2 % from the calculated densities, with an average of -0.3 % and a standard deviation of 0.3 %, which is about three times larger than the standard deviation of the data reported here.…”
Section: Aqueous Phase Of Co2 + H2osupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 6(b) shows how data available in the literature for the aqueous phase densities of the CO2 + H2O binary compare with the new data, as well as densities calculated using the EOS-CG of Gernert and Span [32]. The new data extend, and are consistent with, the data sets reported by Hebach et al [7], Yan et al [25] and Yaginuma et al [11], which have a similar degree of scatter to the current work. In contrast, the data of Chiquet et al [9] have relative deviations of as much as -1.2 % from the calculated densities, with an average of -0.3 % and a standard deviation of 0.3 %, which is about three times larger than the standard deviation of the data reported here.…”
Section: Aqueous Phase Of Co2 + H2osupporting
confidence: 85%
“…(a) Symbols: this work , T = 293 K; , T = 298 K; , T = 308 K; , T = 323 K; , T = 343 K; , T = 373 K; , T = 398 K; , T = 423 K; , T = 448 K. Curves: ρaq predicted using the EOS of Spycher et al [16], [18] (for saturated phase composition) in place of the Duan et al [14] at the experimental conditions studied in this work. (b) Symbols: , this work; , Chiquet et al [9]; , Yan et al [36]; , Hebach et al [7]; ,Tabasinejad et al [10]; , Yaginuma et al [11]. Curves: ρaq predicted (entirely) with the EOS-CG of Span and co-workers [32] at the experimental conditions studied in this work.…”
Section: Aqueous Phase Of Co2 + H2omentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assume our water liquid is saturated with CO 2 . The results of Teng et al (1997) are in agreement with solution densities from Hebach et al (2004) and Garcia (2001). We see from fig.9 that clathrates tend to keep the solubility of CO 2 lower than the value when in equilibrium with the pure fluid of CO 2 .…”
Section: The Co 2 Si Clathrate Phase Diagramsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Subscripts m and w denote the CO 2 + water mixture and the initial water, respectively. Both viscosity [1,29] and density [9,25] are functions of the CO 2 concentration and increase with increasing carbon dioxide concentration. The pressure in both phases is the same as we ignore the capillary forces and therefore p m = p w = p. The saturated density difference between an aqueous solution of CO 2 and pure water is given by c ρ p g , where the value of the c ρ = 0.261 kg/m 3 /bar for pure water (see [21], p. 72); c ρ will be less for formation brines, because the solubility of CO 2 in water decreases with increasing salinity.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%