2014
DOI: 10.1134/s106935131403001x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density, stress, and gravity anomalies in the interiors of the earth and mars and the probable geodynamical implications: Comparative analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the non-uniqueness of linear inversions hinders an unambiguous determination of crust-mantle density contrast and Mohorovicic depth. Chujkova et al (2014) proposed to take into account the contribution of the quadratic terms of topographic masses and density contrast in the external gravity potential in order to tackle the problem, showing the feasibility in Earth's case, but the spherical harmonic degree considered is very low (18). Furthermore, Mohorovicic estimation using potential data is hampered by a strong non-equilibrium due to the dichotomy (e.g.…”
Section: Velocity/density Jump At the Mohomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the non-uniqueness of linear inversions hinders an unambiguous determination of crust-mantle density contrast and Mohorovicic depth. Chujkova et al (2014) proposed to take into account the contribution of the quadratic terms of topographic masses and density contrast in the external gravity potential in order to tackle the problem, showing the feasibility in Earth's case, but the spherical harmonic degree considered is very low (18). Furthermore, Mohorovicic estimation using potential data is hampered by a strong non-equilibrium due to the dichotomy (e.g.…”
Section: Velocity/density Jump At the Mohomentioning
confidence: 99%