2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2012.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density structure of the mantle transition zone and the dynamic geoid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21] Density variations are calculated using standard velocity-to-density scaling factor ¼ 0.2 (equation (19)), which is generally consistent with the mineral physics estimations and previous studies [e.g., Karato, 1993;Mitrovica and Forte, 2004;Steinberger and Calderwood, 2006;Kaban and Trubitsyn, 2012]. These are applied to the S40RTS model [Ritsema et al, 2011] as follows:…”
Section: Effects Of Lvv On the Geoidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] Density variations are calculated using standard velocity-to-density scaling factor ¼ 0.2 (equation (19)), which is generally consistent with the mineral physics estimations and previous studies [e.g., Karato, 1993;Mitrovica and Forte, 2004;Steinberger and Calderwood, 2006;Kaban and Trubitsyn, 2012]. These are applied to the S40RTS model [Ritsema et al, 2011] as follows:…”
Section: Effects Of Lvv On the Geoidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[]. In addition, we remove the effects of the transition zone boundaries, as determined by Kaban and Trubitsyn []. The total gravity effect of the mantle density heterogeneities below 325 km is shown in Figure a.…”
Section: Residual Mantle Gravity Anomalies and Residual Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first stage the crustal effect is removed from the Bouguer gravity anomalies and topography. Furthermore, the effect of deep heterogeneity of the Earth is reduced using recent global dynamic models [ Kaban and Trubitsyn , ; Petrunin et al ., ]. The calculated residuals reflect the effect of the upper mantle density variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we employed the same global dynamic model used by Kaban et al [2015aKaban et al [ , 2016, which provides the effects of deep density anomalies below 325 km (bottom of the upper mantle model in this study). This model includes the effect of lateral variations of viscosity, weak plate boundaries, and the density variation related to the phase transition boundaries [Kaban and Trubitsyn, 2012;Petrunin et al, 2013;Kaban et al, 2014a]. More details on these calculations and maps of the gravity field and dynamic topography, induced by the density heterogeneity below 325 km, are provided in the supporting information [Gu et al, 2003;Kaban et al, 2014a;Flament et al, 2013].…”
Section: Mantle Gravity Anomalies and Residual Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%