2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12215-017-0316-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density upper bound for congruent and non-congruent hyperball packings generated by truncated regular simplex tilings

Abstract: In this paper we study congruent and non-congruent hyperball (hypersphere) packings of the truncated regular tetrahedron tilings. These are derived from the Coxeter simplex tilings {p, 3, 3} (7 ≤ p ∈ N) and {5, 3, 3, 3, 3} in 3 and 5-dimensional hyperbolic space. We determine the densest hyperball packing arrangements related to the above tilings. We find packing densities using congruent hyperballs and determine the smallest density upper bound of non-congruent hyperball packings generated by the above tiling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we showed that the densest known hyperball packing, dually related to the regular prism tilings, introduced in [12], can be realized by a regular truncated tetrahedron tiling with density ≈ 0.82251. [18] we discussed the problem of congruent and non-congruent hyperball (hypersphere) packings to each truncated regular tetrahedron tiling. These are derived from the Coxeter simplex tilings {p, 3, 3} and {5, 3, 3, 3, 3} in the 3 and 5-dimensional hyperbolic space.…”
Section: Remark 33mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we showed that the densest known hyperball packing, dually related to the regular prism tilings, introduced in [12], can be realized by a regular truncated tetrahedron tiling with density ≈ 0.82251. [18] we discussed the problem of congruent and non-congruent hyperball (hypersphere) packings to each truncated regular tetrahedron tiling. These are derived from the Coxeter simplex tilings {p, 3, 3} and {5, 3, 3, 3, 3} in the 3 and 5-dimensional hyperbolic space.…”
Section: Remark 33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18] we discussed congruent and non-congruent hyperball (hypersphere) packings of the truncated regular tetrahedron tilings. These are derived from the Coxeter simplex tilings {p, 3, 3} (7 ≤ p ∈ N) and {5, 3, 3, 3, 3} in 3and 5-dimensional hyperbolic space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to the former cases (see [21], [22], [24], [14], [16], [17]) it is interesting to study and to construct locally optimal congruent and non-congruent hyperball packings relating to suitable truncated polyhedron tilings in 3-and higher dimensions as well. This study fits into our program to look for the upper bound density of the congruent and non-congruent hyperball packings in H n .…”
Section: On Hyperball Packings In a Doubly Truncated Orthoschemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25] we discussed congruent and non-congruent hyperball packings of the truncated regular tetrahedron tilings. These are derived from the Coxeter simplex tilings {p, 3, 3} (7 ≤ p ∈ N) and {5, 3, 3, 3, 3} in 3-and 5-dimensional hyperbolic space.…”
Section: Hyperball (Hypersphere) Packingsmentioning
confidence: 99%