2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental age is more appropriate than chronological age for evaluating the mandibular movement range in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hirsch et al (2006) [ 34 ], when assessing the range of mandibular movement in over 1000 German children aged 10–17 years, noted the average value of lateral movement to the right as 10.2 ± 2.2 mm, to the left as 10.6 ± 2.3 mm, and protrusive movement as 8.2 ± 2.5 mm. Steinmassl et al (2017) [ 35 ], assessing the same parameters in 146 Austrian children aged 8–10 years, noted 10.0 ± 1.8, 10.1 ± 1.9, and 9.1 ± 2.0 mm, respectively. In our studies, the range of these movements was smaller in JIA patients compared to those of the studies mentioned above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hirsch et al (2006) [ 34 ], when assessing the range of mandibular movement in over 1000 German children aged 10–17 years, noted the average value of lateral movement to the right as 10.2 ± 2.2 mm, to the left as 10.6 ± 2.3 mm, and protrusive movement as 8.2 ± 2.5 mm. Steinmassl et al (2017) [ 35 ], assessing the same parameters in 146 Austrian children aged 8–10 years, noted 10.0 ± 1.8, 10.1 ± 1.9, and 9.1 ± 2.0 mm, respectively. In our studies, the range of these movements was smaller in JIA patients compared to those of the studies mentioned above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be emphasized, however, dentofacial deformity and TMJ dysfunction, which are consequences of condylar growth disturbances rather than arthritis-induced condylar damage alone, do not only depend on the course of TMJ arthritis and damage to the growth center, but are also related to a complex of multiple factors impairing craniofacial development [ 6 , 37 ]. These factors include degenerations and deformations, mechanical overloads, dysfunctions and parafunction of the masticatory organ, as well as factors compensating for the abnormal development of the dentofacial complex [ 6 , 35 , 37 ] that TMJ arthritis directly affects through damage to the growth center and inhibition of mandibular growth, including inhibition and hypoplasia of the condylar process. This, in turn, induces TMJ deformation and dysfunction, leading to increased friction in the joint, mechanical stress, and excessive load on joint surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%