2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2018.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental and skeletal changes associated with long-term oral appliance use for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some previous studies have reported that subjective feelings of bite changes decrease over time [6,9], while the degree of objectively assessed bite changes increases [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]16]. The patients included in the present study had used oral appliances for at least 3 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some previous studies have reported that subjective feelings of bite changes decrease over time [6,9], while the degree of objectively assessed bite changes increases [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]16]. The patients included in the present study had used oral appliances for at least 3 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Occlusal changes are common during long-term treatment with oral appliances (OAs) for sleep apnea [1,2], but patients more seldom complain of any dental side effects [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A meta-analysis of skeletal changes from MAD use reported no significant skeletal changes. 53 Other investigators, however, report significant increase in lower and total anterior facial height from longterm MAD use of more than 2 years. 60,61 Temporomandibular Joint Disorders Transient muscle soreness and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) discomfort have been reported after MAD use, especially during the initial titration period.…”
Section: Craniofacial Changesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There was no significant change in the upper incisor inclination or interincisal angle. 53 Due to the lower incisor inclination change and attendant decrease in OJ and OB, there was significant increase in anterior crossbites, 54 increase in mandibular arch width, and reduction in lower arch crowding. 54,55 Maxillary arch width increase and upper arch decrowding also have been reported.…”
Section: Dental Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%