Technique and Application in Dental Anthropology 2008
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511542442.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental caries prevalence by sex in prehistory: magnitude and meaning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, females from both archaeological collections and epidemiological surveys tend to have significantly more carious teeth than males (National Research Council, 1952;Lukacs and Thompson, 2008), although a similar frequency between sexes has sometimes been reported ( Delgado-Darias et al, 2005). Many biological and cultural factors may produce this sexual difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, females from both archaeological collections and epidemiological surveys tend to have significantly more carious teeth than males (National Research Council, 1952;Lukacs and Thompson, 2008), although a similar frequency between sexes has sometimes been reported ( Delgado-Darias et al, 2005). Many biological and cultural factors may produce this sexual difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of sex difference in caries prevalence among the Bunun assemblage (male 12.0%, female 17.6%) is considerably greater compared to that of other Asian groups in past societies reported by Lukacs and Thompson (2008) (male average 8.1%, female average 10.9%). Therefore, it appears unlikely that the biological factors described above exclusively led to the sex-specific caries prevalence of the Bunun assemblage.…”
Section: Sex Difference Of Oral Disease Prevalencementioning
confidence: 67%
“…It is widely reported that females generally display worse dental health, especially caries prevalence, than males in past and present contexts (Walker and Erlandson, 1986;Walker and Hewlett, 1990;Larsen, 1997;Fujita et al, 2007;Lukacs and Thompson, 2008;Temple, 2011). One factor contributing to this sex difference could be female life history connected with reproductive ecology: cariogenic oral environments could be produced by changes in saliva composition and volume accompanying changes in estrogen levels triggered by menstruation and pregnancy (Lukacs and Largaespada, 2006;Lukacs and Thompson, 2008). In addition, two cultural factors may explain the sex difference in caries prevalence, both of which are related to the sexual division of labor in past societies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely reported that females generally display poorer dental health than males in past and present contexts, especially in the prevalence of caries (Walker and Erlandson, 1986;Walker and Hewlett, 1990;Larsen, 1997;Lukacs and Thompson, 2008). One factor contributing to this difference could be ascribed to female life history connected with reproductive physiology: cariogenic oral environments could be produced by changes in saliva composition and volume, which is accompanied with changes in estrogen levels triggered by menstruation and pregnancy (Lukacs and Largaespada, 2006;Lukacs and Thompson, 2008).…”
Section: -Fold That Of Females In Both Age Categories (Figure 5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One factor contributing to this difference could be ascribed to female life history connected with reproductive physiology: cariogenic oral environments could be produced by changes in saliva composition and volume, which is accompanied with changes in estrogen levels triggered by menstruation and pregnancy (Lukacs and Largaespada, 2006;Lukacs and Thompson, 2008). How- ever, the sex difference in caries prevalence among the Tuchengzi Warring States assemblage is considerably larger compared to other Asian groups in past societies reported by Lukacs and Thompson (2008) (male average 8.1%, female average 10.9%). Therefore, non-biological factors should also be considered as causes for the sex differences in the prevalence of caries among the Tuchengzi Warring States assemblage.…”
Section: -Fold That Of Females In Both Age Categories (Figure 5)mentioning
confidence: 99%