2015
DOI: 10.4103/2319-5932.171181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental caries status in 6–14-year-old schoolchildren of rural Channagiri, Davangere: A cross-sectional survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean DMFT (0.13) in our study was low and in agreement with other studies from East Africa [ 19 – 21 ]. As expected, the prevalence of dental caries in this study was significantly higher in older than in younger age groups [ 15 17 , 64 , 65 ]. The decayed component (D) of the DMFT- index in our study constituted 90%, and the missing component (M) was 10%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The mean DMFT (0.13) in our study was low and in agreement with other studies from East Africa [ 19 – 21 ]. As expected, the prevalence of dental caries in this study was significantly higher in older than in younger age groups [ 15 17 , 64 , 65 ]. The decayed component (D) of the DMFT- index in our study constituted 90%, and the missing component (M) was 10%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The development of caries lesions is associated with many factors, including biological, behavioral, and socioeconomic determinants [1,2]. Some of the primary factors underlying dental caries include poor dietary habits and oral hygiene behaviors, Streptococcus mutans infection, anomalies of tooth development, and lack of dental care [3]. Left untreated, caries can lead to pain, infection, lost school days, problems with speech and language development, and other long-term effects that adversely impact quality of life [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such negligence has been seen worldwide in primary teeth. 8,9 In this study, it was found that the percentage of the participants with decayed, missing and filled teeth had almost similar values when they were evaluated using the DMFT index and CAST index, making the results obtained more easily comparable. The WHO and CAST index scores obtained in the present study did not show any significant difference between dmft/DMFT scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%