1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90196-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental erosion of nonindustrial origin. A clinical survey and classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
1
62

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
111
1
62
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of eroded dentine expressed in percentage terms of the area of the surface was first described by Eccles who used <1/3 or >1/3 as the threshold for the grades Class II or Class III. 15 A better descriptor is exposed dentine as this is exactly what is seen. Dentinal exposure should not, however, be a surrogate marker for erosion or any other mode of wear.…”
Section: Opinionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The amount of eroded dentine expressed in percentage terms of the area of the surface was first described by Eccles who used <1/3 or >1/3 as the threshold for the grades Class II or Class III. 15 A better descriptor is exposed dentine as this is exactly what is seen. Dentinal exposure should not, however, be a surrogate marker for erosion or any other mode of wear.…”
Section: Opinionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The tooth erosion is characterized by a chemical wear of dental mineralized tissues without bacterial involvement [6][7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the clinical examination, the following clinical data regarding dental erosion were collected: dental wear (dental morphology was observed in both tooth arches and classified as absent or present) and type (class I-III) (15).…”
Section: Clinical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%