2022
DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental hygienists’ use of motivational interviewing and perceptions of effectiveness in changing patient behaviors

Abstract: Background:The University of Minnesota (UMN) Dental Hygiene (DH) program devotes considerable time developing students' competency using motivational interviewing (MI). However, the extent to which graduates use MI in clinical practice and their perceptions of MI effectiveness in changing behavior is unknown. Methods: A cross-section of UMN dental hygiene classes from 2010-2019 were emailed an electronic survey using Qualtrics xm software (n = 208). The survey instrument collected demographic information and q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, including a brief motivational interviewing- (MI-) informed component will be critical to increasing behavioral uptake. MI training has been developed specifically for dental hygienists [ 54 , 55 ] and this training may have the added benefit of increasing hygienist self-efficacy to use the skills for other oral health-related behaviors among their patients. Clinical training in MI will be critical to not only understanding the key principles but also increasing clinician self-efficacy and effectiveness of implementation [ 52 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, including a brief motivational interviewing- (MI-) informed component will be critical to increasing behavioral uptake. MI training has been developed specifically for dental hygienists [ 54 , 55 ] and this training may have the added benefit of increasing hygienist self-efficacy to use the skills for other oral health-related behaviors among their patients. Clinical training in MI will be critical to not only understanding the key principles but also increasing clinician self-efficacy and effectiveness of implementation [ 52 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%