Dental implants in patients with bruxing habits

Lobbezoo, Frank; Brouwers, Joost E. I. G.; Cune, Marco S.; Naeije, M.

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01542.x

Cited by 121 publications

(133 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

124

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In accordance with the literature review conducted by Lobbezoo et al 8 , bruxism is generally considered a contraindication for the installation of dental implants. Due to the fact that possible causal relations between bruxism and implant failure lack specific and consistent results, this study urges professionals to use a clinical guide when attending patients with bruxism.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 64%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Relation between bruxism and dental implants

Torcato

Zuim

Brandini

et al. 2014

RGO, Rev. Gaúch. Odontol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to gather information and discuss the predictability of implant-supported prostheses in patients with bruxism by performing a literature review. Methods In order to select the studies included in this review, a detailed search was performed in PubMed and Conclusion Although there is still no general consensus on this matter, most of the literature review articles do provide clinical guidelines that contribute to implant supported prostheses longevity and stability in patients with bruxism.Indexing terms: Bruxism. Dental implantation. Dental prosthesis. RESUMO ObjetivoRealizar uma revisão sistemática, a fim de reunir informações e discutir a previsibilidade de próteses sobre implantes em pacientes com bruxismo.Métodos Para a identificação dos estudos dessa revisão, foi realizada uma estratégia de busca detalhada e avançada nos bancos de dados PubMed e Medline. Foram utilizados como descritores: bruxismo, implantes dentários, prótese implantossuportada e falha da restauração dentárial; bruxism, dental implants, implant-supported prosthesis e dental restoration failure. Os critérios de inclusão foram: artigos clínicos, estudos controlados aleatórios, estudos in vitro, revisões de literatura e revisões sistemáticas com e sem meta-análise dos últimos 20 anos que abordassem o tema proposto. Os critérios de exclusão foram: artigos sem resumo, estudos em animais, artigos cujo idioma não fosse o inglês e artigos de periódicos que não pertencessem à área odontológica. ResultadosDe um total de 54 artigos, após uma análise segundo o critério de inclusão e exclusão, foram selecionados 28 artigos. É sabido que a quantidade de artigos científicos que avaliaram, seja através de estudos retrospectivos, prospectivos ou experimentais, o impacto biológico e biomecânico do bruxismo em próteses sobre implantes é pequena e pouco tem contribuído para melhor exemplificação e discernimento dos limites protéticos de segurança para o especialista sob um ponto de vista clínico. ConclusãoPortanto, ainda não há um consenso geral acerca desse assunto, porém, a maioria dos artigos de revisão de literatura fornecem guias de orientação clínica, os quais auxiliam na longevidade e estabilidade de próteses sobre implantes em pacientes com bruxismo.Termos de indexação: Bruxismo. Implantação dentária. Prótese dentária. failure. Items that were included are: case reports, randomized controlled trials, in vitro studies, literature and systematic reviews, with or without meta-analysis, of the last 20 years that addressed the theme. Articles without abstracts, animal studies, articles in languages other than English and articles from journals unrelated to the dental field were excluded. After analysis according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 28 articles were selected from a total of 54. The obtained data were then analysed, crossreferenced and debated in order to reach conclusions. Relation between bruxism and dental implants

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 64%

“…They are considered harmful to the stomatognathic system 7 , and their effects depend on the magnitude and direction of the forces 8 . Naert et al 9 have indicated that overload caused by parafunctional habits is the most likely cause of dental implant and marginal bone tissue loss.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relation between bruxism and dental implants

Torcato

Zuim

Brandini

et al. 2014

RGO, Rev. Gaúch. Odontol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…24 Excessive loading has been associated with non axial forces, cantilevers, parafunction and increased implantabutment ratios. 25,26,27 Mechanical complications have also been associated with the inappropriate selection or use of materials, manufacturing imperfections, ill-fitting frameworks and trauma. 3,28,29 In partially edentulous patients implant supported prostheses should be designed so that they allow light occlusal contact in the intercuspal position.…”

Section: Mechanical Complicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…24,27 Following treatment, hard nocturnal splints have been advocated to reduce the incidence of mechanical complications. 25 However, these are only likely to be effective if patient compliance is good. Frameworks should be constructed from appropriate materials, be of adequate thickness and designed appropriately to support the veneering material which may be porcelain, acrylic or composite resin.…”

Section: Mechanical Complicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prosthodontic complications associated with implant retained crowns and bridgework: a review of the literature

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Bruxism is also said to have some amount of effect on the success of implant-supported prosthesis. 6 Hence, we aimed for the present study to assess the incidence of prosthetic complications in patients rehabilitated with implant-borne prosthesis in a sleep disorder unit.…”

Section: /Jp-journals-10024-2133mentioning

confidence: 99%

Incidence of Prosthetic Complications associated with Implant-borne Prosthesis in a Sleep Disorder Center

Suneel¹,

Kotian

Jujare

et al. 2017

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the common prevalent conditions present worldwide. The process of abnormal habits related to clenching and grinding of teeth is referred to as bruxism and is characterized under the heading of parafunctional activity of the masticatory system. Osseointegrated dental implants represent advancements in the field of odontology. Despite its high success rate, failure and complications are often associated with dental implant treatment due to a number of factors. Hence, we aimed for the present study to assess the incidence of prosthetic complications in patients rehabilitated with implant-borne prosthesis in a sleep disorder unit. Materials and methods:The present study included the assessment of all the patients who underwent prosthetic rehabilitation by dental implants. An experienced registered prosthodontist was given duty for examination of all the cases from the record file data. Prosthetic complications in the patients were identified using photographs, radiographs, and all other relevant data of the patients obtained from the record files. All types of complications and other factors were recorded separately and analyzed.Results: While correlating the prosthetic complications in OSA patients grouped based on number of dental implants, nonsignificant results were obtained. Significant correlation was observed while comparing the prosthetic complications

show abstract

Dental implants in patients with bruxing habits

Cited by 121 publications

References 35 publications

Relation between bruxism and dental implants

Relation between bruxism and dental implants

Prosthodontic complications associated with implant retained crowns and bridgework: a review of the literature

Incidence of Prosthetic Complications associated with Implant-borne Prosthesis in a Sleep Disorder Center

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About