Dental Patient Preferences and Choice in Clinical Decision-Making

Abstract

In economics, the concept of utility refers to the strength of customer preference. In health care assessment, the visual analogue scale (VAS), the standard gamble, and the time trade-off are used to measure health state utilities. These utility measurements play a key role in promoting shared decision-making in dental care. Individual preference, however, is complex and dynamic. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between patient preference and educational intervention in the field of dental health. The data were collected by distributing questionnaires to employees of two companies in Japan. Participants were aged 18-65 years and consisted of 111 males and 93 females (204 in total). One company (Group A) had a dental program of annual check-ups and health education in the workplace, while the other company (Group B) had no such program. Statistical analyses were performed with the t-test and Chi-square test. The questionnaire items were designed to determine: (1) oral health-related quality of life, (2) dental health state utilities (using VAS), and (3) time trade-off for regular dental check-ups. The percentage of respondents in both groups who were satisfied with chewing function, appearance of teeth, and social function ranged from 23.1 to 42.4%. There were no significant differences between groups A and B in the VAS of decayed, filled, and missing teeth. The VAS of gum bleeding was 42.8 in Group A and 51.3 in Group B (p<0.05). The percentage of persons having a regular dental check-up every three months was 34.1 and 31.3% in Groups A and B respectively. These results suggest that low preference results from lack of opportunity or utilization of dental care in the worksite. Ascertaining the factors involved in patient preference may have significant potential benefits in shared decision-making.

Quantifying health utilities of young adult orthodontic patients using the time trade-off method: a cross-sectional study

“…Utility value analysis is being widely employed to find not only patient preferences when it comes to treatment choices, but also to investigate cost effectiveness of various treatment modalities through cost utility analyses 14,15 Demographic characteristics like age and gender were not associated with health utilities, which was in line with previous research. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Although the quality of life scores as measured by OQLQ scores were lesser for Class III, and skeletal malocclusion as compared to Class I and II, the differences were not statistically significant.…”

Questions and health outcomes prioritization for the development of a COVID‐19 dental clinical practice guideline: A case study

“…Using a rating scale like VAS to estimate health state values is easier than other direct and indirect methods, but the theoretical basis of this method is weaker. Nevertheless, studies that have used the rating scale to assess outcomes in dentistry concluded that this measure is valid and reliable 18,20,21 . Finally, we did not include patients for the estimation of health utility.…”

Time to Assess Cost-Effectiveness of Technologies in Dentistry

“…For example, Nassani and Kay [31] measured values in relation to tooth loss, Cunningham and Hunt [32] estimated values for dento-facial deformity and Fukai et al [33] valued health states in order to compare the outcomes of an educational intervention in the field of dental health.…”