“…Interestingly, most of the fossil platyrrhine species of the early Miocene have been found at middle and high latitudes (i.e., central Chile and Patagonia), which are areas that are nowadays uninhabited by non-human primates ( Bordas, 1942 , Fleagle and Bown, 1983 , Fleagle et al., 1987 , Fleagle and Kay, 1989 , Fleagle, 1990 , Meldrum, 1990 , Flynn et al., 1995 , Tejedor, 2002 , Tejedor, 2003 , Tejedor, 2005a , Tejedor, 2005b ), as well as one from a tropical-equatorial area (i.e., Peruvian Amazonia) ( Marivaux et al., 2012 ) and one from Panama ( Bloch et al., 2016 ). Even though the NWM fossil record has improved considerably over the past several years ( Tejedor, 2008 , Bond et al., 2015 , Kay, 2015a , Bloch et al., 2016 , Marivaux et al., 2016a , Marivaux et al., 2016b ), it is still difficult to trace the origin of major modern clades (i.e., Atelidae, Pitheciidae and Cebidae), especially considering that some of the earliest fossil taxa may fall outside the crown radiation ( Kay et al., 2008 , Hodgson et al., 2009 , Kay and Fleagle, 2010 , Youlatos and Meldrum, 2011 ; but for a different opinion see Schrago, 2007 , Rosenberger, 2010 ). There are two diverging positions regarding the relationship between the early platyrrhine fossils and the modern species that have been proposed: the long lineage hypothesis (LLH) and the stem platyrrhine hypothesis (SPH) ( Kay et al., 2008 ).…”