2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10914-020-09508-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental Variation in Megabats (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae): Tooth Metrics Correlate with Body Size and Tooth Proportions Reflect Phylogeny

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dental morphology has been shown to have both a phylogenetic and ecological signal, reflecting evolutionary relatedness as well as ecological differences within Chiroptera (e.g. Freeman 1988, 1995, 2000, Hand 1985, 1996, 1998, Santana et al 2011, Self 2015, Simmons et al 2016, Zuercher et al 2020. Our results also detected a dual phylogenetic and ecological signal in dental complexity variation and highlights DTA as a potential tool in the study of dental ecology and evolution in bats.…”
Section: Dta and Dietary Specialisations In Batssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Dental morphology has been shown to have both a phylogenetic and ecological signal, reflecting evolutionary relatedness as well as ecological differences within Chiroptera (e.g. Freeman 1988, 1995, 2000, Hand 1985, 1996, 1998, Santana et al 2011, Self 2015, Simmons et al 2016, Zuercher et al 2020. Our results also detected a dual phylogenetic and ecological signal in dental complexity variation and highlights DTA as a potential tool in the study of dental ecology and evolution in bats.…”
Section: Dta and Dietary Specialisations In Batssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Scapular morphology in bats has been correlated with the convergent evolution of dietary adaptations (Gaudioso et al 2020). Dental morphology has been shown to have both a phylogenetic signal and an ecological signal, reflecting evolutionary relatedness as well as ecological differences within Chiroptera (e.g., Hand 1985, 1996, 1998; Freeman 1988, 1995, 2000; Santana et al 2011; Self 2015; Simmons et al 2016; Zuercher et al 2020). Our results also detected a dual phylogenetic and ecological signal in dental complexity variation, which highlights DTA as a potential tool in the study of dental ecology and evolution in bats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have a few hints. Previous analyses have shown that mandibular MMC is likely more evolutionarily conserved than PMM within catarrhine primates [ 38 ], across Boreoeutheria [ 53 ], between the different genera of megabats [ 54 ], and in the fossil record of the hominids [ 52 ]. Our results here for cercopithecids similarly demonstrate that the genetic mechanism captured by maxillary PMM appears to be more evolutionarily labile than maxillary MMC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mandibular versions of MMC and PMM were first identified for cercopithecid monkeys and then expanded to apes, revealing an episode of selection during the Late Miocene [ 38 ]. While we do not yet know the genetic mechanisms that underlie PMM and MMC, we do know that these two ratios reflect a genetic architecture that does not simultaneously influence body size or sex, and that appears to primarily influence variation in the relative sizes of teeth in the postcanine dentition of catarrhine primates [ 38 , 52 ] and many other mammals [ 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Background: Traditional and G:p-mapped Dental Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%