Dentin-cement Interfacial Interaction

Atmeh, Amre R.; Chong, Ee Zhuan; Richard, Gilles; Festy, Frederic; Watson, Timothy F.

doi:10.1177/0022034512443068

Cited by 264 publications

(137 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

110

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It also allows better penetration within dentin tubules for mechanical retention. 27,28 Although all three cements exhibited similar bond strength in the present study, the failure mode of Biodentine was different with a higher incidence of cohesive failure. This suggests that Biodentine may be used as an alternative to MTA because of its improved stability at the filling site.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 47%

Push-out bond strength of different tricalcium silicate-based filling materials to root dentin

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Push-out bond strength of different tricalcium silicate-based filling materials to root dentin Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of different triccalcium silicate cements to retrograde cavity using a push out test. Thirty maxillary central incisors were shaped using #80 hand files and sectioned transversally. Root slices were obtained from the apical 4 mm after eliminating the apical extremity. The specimens were embedded in acrylic resin and positioned at 45° to the horizontal plane for preparation of root-end cavities with a diamond ultrasonic retrotip. The samples were divided into three groups according to the root-end filling material (n = 10): MTA Angelus, ProRoot MTA and Biodentine. A gutta-percha cone (#80) was tugged-back at the limit between the canal and the root-end cavity. The root-end cavity was filled and the gutta-percha cone was removed after complete setting of the materials. The specimens were placed in an Instron machine with the root-end filling turned downwards. The push-out shaft was inserted in the space previously occupied by the gutta-percha cone and push out testing was performed at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. There was no statistically significant difference in resistance to push out by the materials tested (p > 0.01). MTA Angelus and ProRoot MTA showed predominantly mixed failure while Biodentine exhibited mixed and cohesive failures. The tricalcium silicate-based root-end filling materials showed similar bond strength retrograde cavity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 47%

Push-out bond strength of different tricalcium silicate-based filling materials to root dentin

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…During the 72 hours of application of Biodentine ® on the culture plate, the modifications that occurred underlined the positive trend of mitochondrial activity. Considering the interface between dentin and Biodentine ® with confocal microscopy, an increased content of carbonate and the creation of a hybrid layer was demonstrated (43,44). Furthermore, Biodentine ® showed the ability to induce the differentiation of odontoblasts starting from pulp progenitor cells, forming a mineralizing matrix with the characteristics of dentin (45).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of different pulp capping materials: a comparative study

Poggio

Ceci

Dagna

et al. 2015

Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Direct pulp capping covers the exposed surface of the pulp to maintain its vitality and preserve its functional and biologic activity. The aim of the present study was to compare the biocompatibility effects of seven different pulp-capping materials in vitro: Dycal®, Calcicur®, Calcimol LC®, TheraCal LC®, ProRoot MTA®, MTA-Angelus®, and Biodentine®. Using the Transwell insert methodology by Alamar blue test, we evaluated the cytocompatibility of the above mentioned materials towards murine odontoblasts cells (MDPC-23) at three different times (24, 48, and 72 h). For additional control, the cell viability at 72 hours was also assessed by MTT assay. Morphological analysis of murine odontoblasts was assessed by Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope. The results indicate significantly different biocompatibility among materials with different composition. Biodentine® and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based products showed lower cytotoxicity, varying from calcium hydroxide-based materials, which exhibited higher cytotoxicity. Although our findings are limited to in vitro conditions, the observation that Biodentine® caused a cytotoxic effect similar to MTA suggests that it may be considered an alternative in pulp-capping treatment, as calcium hydroxide-based materials present higher cytotoxic effects.

show abstract

“…Moreover, the different particle sizes of MTA and Biodentine may affect their penetration into the dentinal tubules, with consequences to displacement resistance. Atmeh et al 18 demonstrated that Ca-Si cements facilitate the permeation of Ca and OH ions into the dentine, due to their caustic effect. It can be assumed that the improved ability to release remineralizing Ca and OH ions by Biodentine 19 is responsible for the improved formation of apatite at the interface 19,20 , and for micromechanical anchorage 21 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Push-out bond strength of MTA HP, a new high-plasticity calcium silicate-based cement

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Push-out bond strength of MTA HP, a new high-plasticity calcium silicate-based cement Abstract: This study was designed to investigate the resistance to dislodgment provided by MTA HP, a new high-plasticity calcium silicate-based cement. Biodentine and White MTA Angelus were used as reference materials for comparison. Three discs 1 ± 0.1 mm thick were obtained from the middle third of the roots of 5 maxillary canines. Three 0.8-mm-wide holes were drilled on the axial surface of each root disc. Standardized irrigation was performed. Then the holes were dried with paper points and filled with one of the three tested cements. The filled dental slices were immersed in a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution (pH 7.2) for 7 days before the push-out assessment. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to assess the effect of each endodontic cement on the push-out bond strength. Mann-Whitney with Bonferroni correction was used to isolate the differences. The alpha-type error was set at 0.05. All specimens had measurable push-out values and no premature failure occurred. There were significant differences among the materials (p <0.05). The Biodentine specimens had the highest push-out bond strength values (p < 0.05). MTA HP had significantly higher bond strength than White MTA (p < 0.05). MTA HP showed better push-out bond strength than its predecessor, White MTA; however, Biodentine had higher dislodgment resistance than both MTA formulations.

show abstract

Dentin-cement Interfacial Interaction

Cited by 264 publications

References 26 publications

Push-out bond strength of different tricalcium silicate-based filling materials to root dentin

Push-out bond strength of different tricalcium silicate-based filling materials to root dentin

In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of different pulp capping materials: a comparative study

Push-out bond strength of MTA HP, a new high-plasticity calcium silicate-based cement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About