Dentist Communication with the Dental Laboratory for Prosthodontic Treatment Using Implants

Afsharzand, Zahra; Rashedi, Behnoush; Petropoulos, Vicki C.

doi:10.1111/j.1532-849x.2006.00102.x

Cited by 21 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Lynch & Allen (2005) (22) examined the quality of communication for fixed prosthodontics in Ireland and found that 55% of written instructions provided were poor or contained no design instruction. Similar inadequate communication has been documented in relation to implants (37). The reasons for inadequate communication by general dental practitioners have historically been attributed to financial and/or educational issues.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Quality of communication and master impressions for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in general dental practice in England, Ireland and Wales in 2009

Kilfeather

Lynch

Sloan

et al. 2010

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of communication and master impressions for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures (RPDs) in general dental practice in England, Ireland and Wales in 2009. Two hundred and ten questionnaires were distributed to 21 laboratories throughout England, Ireland and Wales. Information was collected regarding the quality of written communication and selection of master impression techniques for cobalt chromium partial dentures in general dental practice. One hundred and forty-four questionnaires were returned (response rate = 68%). Alginate was the most popular impression material being used in 58% of cases (n = 84), while plastic stock trays were the most popular impression tray, being used in 31% of cases (n = 44). Twenty-four per cent (n = 35) of impressions were not adequately disinfected. Opposing casts were provided in 81% of cases (n = 116). Written instructions were described as being 'clear' in 31% of cases (n = 44). In 54% of cases (n = 76), the technician was asked to design the RPD. Based on the findings of this study, written communication for cobalt chromium RPDs by general dental practitioners is inadequate. This finding is in breach of relevant contemporary legal and ethical guidance. There are also concerns in relation to the fabrication process for this form of prosthesis, particularly, in relation to consideration of occlusal schemes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Quality of communication and master impressions for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in general dental practice in England, Ireland and Wales in 2009

Kilfeather

Lynch

Sloan

et al. 2010

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The evidence presented here indicates that our IPE curriculum is somewhat effective in addressing concerns around communication and collaboration -issues that have been extensively raised in the literature (14,17,19). Some dentistry students saw little value in 'sitting alongside' dental technology students.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

“…A technician receives a prescription (work authorisation) from a dentist, dental prosthetist or dental specialist regarding the fabrication or repair of an oral prosthesis (14). The dental technician uses his/her theoretical and practical knowledge to determine appropriate materials, design, construction techniques and positioning of various components to meet the patient's needs for restoration of function and aesthetics (15).…”

Section: The Dental Technicianmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Interprofessional learning enhances knowledge of roles but is less able to shift attitudes: a case study from dental education

Evans

Henderson

Johnson

2012

Eur J Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Interprofessional education (IPE) purports to improve team working through improved knowledge of the roles of others, and by engendering mutual respect. This case study aimed to determine the impact of an IPE curriculum on knowledge and attitudes of dentistry and dental technology students undertaking these curricula in the new School of Dentistry and Oral Health at Griffith University. All dental technology students and third‐ and final‐ (fifth) year dentistry students were invited to participate. Method: A mixed‐method approach was used to compare attitudes, perceptions and experiences of students involved in our IPE curricula. Quantitative data were evaluated with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), and qualitative findings were explored through an Excel® spreadsheet coding frame tested against LeximancerTM qualitative software for consistency. Results: Forty‐six of the 131 eligible students participated. Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scales (RIPLS) and focus groups consistently showed that IPE positively influenced professional identity and improved communication between and amongst all students and assisted them in developing their roles. A prevailing sense of greater importance and a lack of mutual respect between dentistry and dental technology students were, unfortunately, evident. The process was, however, sufficient to enhance teamwork and collaboration when planned learning revolved around explicit patient care in the provision of dental prostheses. Conclusion: Further development of such curricula is needed to maximise IP learning (IPL) opportunities, to shift traditional attitudes and, potentially, to improve the outcomes of patient care. To enable this, academic and clinical leaders need to embrace the ideals of IPE.

show abstract

“…36,37 Technician involvement at the planning stages of a proposed restoration that requires a gingival component has been recommended. 31 Where ridge lap design is critical for aesthetics, technician input is important to produce an aesthetic and cleansable result.…”

Section: Technician-clinician Interfacementioning

confidence: 99%

The prosthetic management of gingival aesthetics

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dentist Communication with the Dental Laboratory for Prosthodontic Treatment Using Implants

Abstract: Most laboratories working on implant prosthodontic cases report inadequate communication between the laboratory and dentists related to materials and techniques used in fabrication of implant restorations.

Cited by 21 publications

References 20 publications

Quality of communication and master impressions for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in general dental practice in England, Ireland and Wales in 2009

Quality of communication and master impressions for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in general dental practice in England, Ireland and Wales in 2009

Interprofessional learning enhances knowledge of roles but is less able to shift attitudes: a case study from dental education

The prosthetic management of gingival aesthetics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About