Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions

Siqueira, Danilo Furquim; Almeira, Renato Rodrigues de; Janson, Guilherme; Brandão, Analu Giampietro; Filho, Carlos Martins Coelho

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.029

Cited by 36 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This effect is often observed with the use of fixed functional appliances, similar finding in other studies was reported after using PowerScope in treatment of Class II malocclusion (6,7) significant reduction in SNA was also reported with the use of Herbst appliance (10) as well as with Jasper Jumper (11) and after treatment with AdvanSync appliance (12,13) Regarding the mandible there was significant anterior displacement demonstrated by statistically significant increase in SNB (P<0.001), Similar finding was reported in other studies using PowerScope Class II corrector (6)(7)(8)(9) same results were demonstrated with TFBC (14)(15)(16) and also with Herbst appliance (5,10,22) and with mandibular protraction appliance (17) . However other studies demonstrated different results as with MARA (18) .…”

Section: Regarding the Skeletal Changessupporting

confidence: 83%

“…Similar protrusion of lower lip was evident with the use of Herbst appliance (22) and with mandibular protrac-tion appliance (17) as well as in a comparative study between AdvanSync appliance and intermaxillary elastics (13) , TFBC appliance (14 ) revealed same result as for distance between lower lip and S-line and significant anterior movement of lower lip towards the E-line was also reported in a study on TFBC (16) .…”

Section: Regarding the Dento-alveolar Changessupporting

confidence: 78%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of the Treatment Outcomes for Class II Malocclusion by Using PowerScope Appliance

Shendy¹,

Ibrahim

Salama

2017

ADJ-for Girls

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Regarding the Skeletal Changessupporting

confidence: 83%

Section: Regarding the Dento-alveolar Changessupporting

confidence: 78%

Evaluation of the Treatment Outcomes for Class II Malocclusion by Using PowerScope Appliance

Shendy¹,

Ibrahim

Salama

2017

ADJ-for Girls

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Many previous studies also reported restriction in the forward growth of maxilla by twin-block, [15][16][17][18][19] by other mandibular protraction appliances, 20 and also by many other functional appliances. 15,17,21 However, few studies reported no restraint effect in the forward movement of maxilla by the removable 22,23 and fixed functional appliances.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 84%

Pitchfork Analysis of Class II Correction using Forsus FRD

Goel¹,

�Sonar²

2013

JIOS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Forsus hybrid functional appliance is not as stiff as the orthopedic devices such as the Herbst [10,22,26], the APM [27,28] and the Mara [29,30], furthermore, it is not as fragile as the "Jasper Jumper" [10,11,31]. It is a comfortable device [7], as it does not completely limit the mandible movement and, in the current version, it shows a very low breakage rate [10,14,[32][33][34].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Optimization of Class II Malocclusion Treatments Using the Forsus™ Fatigue Resistance Device and Its Post-Treatment Effect in Adult Patients: A Case Report

Badreddine¹,

Nagai²,

Goncalves³

et al. 2017

Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

tends to move forward [2]. The mandible may undergo anterior shift, improving the maxillomandibular relationship [1,3,5,6,11,13,15]. However, the effective growth of the mandible will rarely be considered an effect genuinely generated by the stimulus of the mandibular anterior growth [1,5,10,15,35,36], although there are authors that report some potential for effective growth in the mandibular body and ramus, when functional fixed devices are used in the pubertal growth peak stage [1,3,6,9,13].In the literature, it has been shown that dentoalveolar changes overcome the skeletal changes when any fixed functional device is used [4][5][6]21]. The mechanism of the dentoalveolar action of such devices over the upper anterior [2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11]14,15,17,28,36,37] and posterior teeth [3,6,[8][9][10][11]13,35,36] and over the lower anterior [5,6,8,[9][10][11][13][14][15]17,28,[35][36][37] and posterior teeth [3,8,[9][10][11]14,17] are often responsible for the clockwise shift of the occlusal [5,9,10,16,17,35] and palatal [2] planes, generating a clockwise resultant on the mandibular plane [9][10][11][12]15] that can cause small increases on the facial height, especially in its lower anterior third [2,9,11,14]. Diagnosis and EtiologyA 21-year old patient looked for orthodontic treatment having as main complaint crowding of upper and lower teeth and a very

show abstract

Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions

Cited by 36 publications

References 29 publications

Evaluation of the Treatment Outcomes for Class II Malocclusion by Using PowerScope Appliance

Evaluation of the Treatment Outcomes for Class II Malocclusion by Using PowerScope Appliance

Pitchfork Analysis of Class II Correction using Forsus FRD

Optimization of Class II Malocclusion Treatments Using the Forsus™ Fatigue Resistance Device and Its Post-Treatment Effect in Adult Patients: A Case Report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About