2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dentoskeletal effects of facemask therapy in skeletal Class III cleft patients with or without bone graft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since different surgical techniques might result in different cephalometric outcomes (Tome et al, 2016), the samples were also matched based on the protocols of primary surgeries. Although skeletal effects resulting from orthopedic treatment are greater when performed after bone grafting (Zhang et al, 2018), the reason to choose patients without bone graft at the age of 9 to 12 years was based only on the fact that the number of patients in this situation was greater than those who underwent RME and MP treatment after bone grafting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since different surgical techniques might result in different cephalometric outcomes (Tome et al, 2016), the samples were also matched based on the protocols of primary surgeries. Although skeletal effects resulting from orthopedic treatment are greater when performed after bone grafting (Zhang et al, 2018), the reason to choose patients without bone graft at the age of 9 to 12 years was based only on the fact that the number of patients in this situation was greater than those who underwent RME and MP treatment after bone grafting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early alveolar bone grafting leads to more efficient application of orthopedic therapy in patients with clefts and concurrent maxillary hypoplasia. 25 However, treatment outcomes are invariably affected by patient responses to surgical intervention and treatment, as well as the reference points chosen by different investigators for angular and linear measurements. There is still no consensus on how the mandible will be affected long term by surgical, orthopedic, and orthodontic treatment in patients with CLP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who had more than 4 mm of A point advancement were included in the experimental group, because this amount of advancement shows a therapeutic effect of one cusp width correction. Since less than 2 mm of A point advancement might be comparable to natural growth changes in patients with CLP, 21 these patients were included in the positive control group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%