Denying access of Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups to contraceptive services: a case study among the Baiga community in Chhattisgarh, India

Abstract

Baigas are a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG), categorised as the most vulnerable amongst indigenous communities in India. As a strategy to stall their decreasing population, due mainly to high mortality, in 1979 the government restricted their access to permanent contraceptive methods, and this is enforced as a "ban". Using a case study design with mixed methods, this study aims to understand the experiences and perceptions of Baigas in Chhattisgarh in accessing contraceptive services. Data was collected through: a household survey (n = 289) in 13 habitations; individual interviews and group discussions with Baiga men and women and health service providers; and anthropometry. The Baiga suffer poor nutritional status and poverty, out of proportion with district and state averages. Of the women interviewed, 61.3% have had four or more pregnancies and 61.3% have experienced the loss of child at least once during pregnancy or later. Baiga women's forehead tattoo, a marker of their identity, is used to deny them contraceptive services. Baiga women either have to travel to the neighbouring state to avail themselves of services, or lie about their identity. They are usually unable to access even the temporary methods. This coercive policy has led to their further impoverishment. Baigas have been demanding the right to contraceptive services. Denying contraceptive services is a violation of reproductive and human rights and the right to self-determination and bodily autonomy.

Exploring inequities, inspiring new knowledge and action

“…Nandi and co-authors write about the Baiga people, a tribal group in India, who have been demanding the right to contraceptive services. 22 Since 1979, their access to permanent, and sometimes temporary, contraceptive methods has been restricted. Their experiences and perceptions in accessing contraceptive services are analysed in the paper, with the authors concluding that the Baiga people are being treated inequitably, discriminated against and denied their reproductive and human rights.…”