2001
DOI: 10.1177/0887302x0101900102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Department Store Apparel Buyers: Relationships Among Environmental Characteristics, Environmental Uncertainty, Boundary Spanning Activities, Managerial Discretion and Power

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to explore the relationships among environmental characteristics, uncertainty, boundary spanning activities, managerial discretion, and power of the department store apparel buyer who assumes combination or independent buyer responsibilities. Almubarek's Model of Organizational Boundary Spanning and Duncan's (1972) Model of Environmental Uncertainty were used as conceptual frameworks. A questionnaire was mailed to buyers who purchased merchandise in the moderate-to-better sportswea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, department store consumers have voiced dissatisfaction over poor style choices, inadequate sizes, and stockouts (Lazorchak and O'Neal, 2001). As a result, major retailers such as the Gap, Dillard's, Federated, and Saks have had to resort to significant discounting of their merchandise to unload products that could not be sold at or near full retail price due to a mismatch between forecasted and actual consumer demand for the items in the store (Derby and Zaczkiewicz, 2006;Young, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, department store consumers have voiced dissatisfaction over poor style choices, inadequate sizes, and stockouts (Lazorchak and O'Neal, 2001). As a result, major retailers such as the Gap, Dillard's, Federated, and Saks have had to resort to significant discounting of their merchandise to unload products that could not be sold at or near full retail price due to a mismatch between forecasted and actual consumer demand for the items in the store (Derby and Zaczkiewicz, 2006;Young, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%