2013
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2012.2223766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependable Demand Response Management in the Smart Grid: A Stackelberg Game Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
336
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 690 publications
(338 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
336
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work [16] addressed the DRM problem in a network of multiple utility companies and consumers where every entity is concerned about maximizing its own benefit. In their model, utility companies communicate with each other, while users receive price information from utility companies and transmit their demand to them.…”
Section: B Similar Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work [16] addressed the DRM problem in a network of multiple utility companies and consumers where every entity is concerned about maximizing its own benefit. In their model, utility companies communicate with each other, while users receive price information from utility companies and transmit their demand to them.…”
Section: B Similar Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [33] presented a game-theoretic double auction market model that allows the incorporation of power markets with multiple users and multiple suppliers, where a noncooperative game was formulated among distributed storage units in an SG. Maharjan et al [34] established a model for multiple utility companies and multiple consumers as a Stackelberg game to maximize the revenue of each company and the payoff of each consumer. Different from only one game model being employed for the scenario with multiple utility companies in the above papers, Chai et al [35] proposed the conception of a two-level game, in which the first-level among multiple utility companies was formulated as a non-cooperative game and the second-level among end users was formulated as a evolutionary game.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was no consideration of the amount of required energy demand, so the required energy level was not guaranteed. Similar to [27], the work of Alshehri [28] is the closest to this study. The authors added the minimum required energy demand as a constraint in the model of [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Similar to [27], the work of Alshehri [28] is the closest to this study. The authors added the minimum required energy demand as a constraint in the model of [27]. However, there was no consideration of a power loss penalty between multiple suppliers and consumers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation