2002
DOI: 10.3354/ame027149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of cyanobacteria defense mode on grazer pressure

Abstract: In a series of experiments we investigated the ability of a cyanobacterium of the genus Phormidium to defend itself against the ciliate grazer Furgasonia blochmanni. The experiments showed that the cyanobacterium can employ different modes of defense, depending on grazer density. Under high grazer pressure, each mat of Phormidium instantly formed a dense clump surrounded by a mucilage layer. Trichomes remaining inside such clumps were completely inaccessible to ciliates. Under medium pressure, the defense reac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
21
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the induced defence is energetically more costly than the constitutive form, it is very effective, especially when prey can adjust the extent of their reaction to the real predatory threat (Tollrian & Harvell 1999). This has been thoroughly studied in several ciliates from the genera Euplotes, Colpidium and Coleps (Kuhlmann & Heckmann 1985, Fyda & Wią ckowski 1998, Wickham & Gugenberger 2008 as well as in green algae (Lürling & Van Donk 1996) and cyanobacteria (Fia8kowska & Pajdak-Stós 2002). Our observations strongly support the results obtained by Fia8kowska & Pajdak-Stós (2002), in that Phormidium adapts its induced defence to grazer pressure and density.…”
Section: Effects Of Pseudomicrothorax On Induced Defence In Phormidiumsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the induced defence is energetically more costly than the constitutive form, it is very effective, especially when prey can adjust the extent of their reaction to the real predatory threat (Tollrian & Harvell 1999). This has been thoroughly studied in several ciliates from the genera Euplotes, Colpidium and Coleps (Kuhlmann & Heckmann 1985, Fyda & Wią ckowski 1998, Wickham & Gugenberger 2008 as well as in green algae (Lürling & Van Donk 1996) and cyanobacteria (Fia8kowska & Pajdak-Stós 2002). Our observations strongly support the results obtained by Fia8kowska & Pajdak-Stós (2002), in that Phormidium adapts its induced defence to grazer pressure and density.…”
Section: Effects Of Pseudomicrothorax On Induced Defence In Phormidiumsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This has been thoroughly studied in several ciliates from the genera Euplotes, Colpidium and Coleps (Kuhlmann & Heckmann 1985, Fyda & Wią ckowski 1998, Wickham & Gugenberger 2008 as well as in green algae (Lürling & Van Donk 1996) and cyanobacteria (Fia8kowska & Pajdak-Stós 2002). Our observations strongly support the results obtained by Fia8kowska & Pajdak-Stós (2002), in that Phormidium adapts its induced defence to grazer pressure and density. During the first 3 d of the experiment, strong pressure from Pseudomicrothorax induced a strong defence reaction in Phormidium filaments.…”
Section: Effects Of Pseudomicrothorax On Induced Defence In Phormidiumsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With regard to top-down control, cyanobacteria are usually organized in filaments and/or colonies, and may produce mucilage layers, that make it much more difficult for zooplankton to feed (graze) on cyanobacteria than on single cell structures (e.g. [38]). These authors have recently shown that the mode of defense adopted by cyanobacteria also depends on grazer pressure; i.e.…”
Section: Biology and Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microcystis are usually organized in colonies, and may produce mucilage layers that make it much more difficult for zooplankton ingestion than in the case of single cells. Failkowsak and Pajdak-Stos (2002) have recently shown that cyanobacteria are able to modify their defense reaction according to grazing risk. Despite these defensive reactions by some phytoplankton, their biomass was shown to decrease significantly during winter periods due to winter grazing by zooplankton (Garnier and Mourelatos, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%