1981
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.24.4412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of ion-electron emission from clean metals on the incidence angle of the projectile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is valid due to the large secondary electron yield for ions striking a channel that results from the combination of the dielectric nature of the channel 41 and the glancing angle of incidence of the radiation striking a channel. 39,40 This is consistent with the results of several studies using keV ions as the primary radiation for which Q C Ϸ1. [43][44][45] Therefore, the apparent maximum value of Q W (E), which is obtained when Q C ϭ1 and EϾ1 V/mm, is approximately 0.66 for incident 20 keV H ϩ .…”
Section: A Applied Electric Field Effects On the Quantum Detection Esupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is valid due to the large secondary electron yield for ions striking a channel that results from the combination of the dielectric nature of the channel 41 and the glancing angle of incidence of the radiation striking a channel. 39,40 This is consistent with the results of several studies using keV ions as the primary radiation for which Q C Ϸ1. [43][44][45] Therefore, the apparent maximum value of Q W (E), which is obtained when Q C ϭ1 and EϾ1 V/mm, is approximately 0.66 for incident 20 keV H ϩ .…”
Section: A Applied Electric Field Effects On the Quantum Detection Esupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For incident ions striking a channel wall, the secondary electron yield is significantly increased due to the glancing angle of incidence 39,40 and the dielectric properties 41 of the channel walls. Here, we expect that this enhanced secondary electron yield results in a quantum detection efficiency close to unity for ions impacting a channel wall.…”
Section: Secondary Electron Yield Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(b) that for lower energies there is a weaker variation of e with angle than 1= cos. This energy angle dependence was noticed previously and at-tributed to three possible factors: scattering and slowing down of the projectile in the region of greater electron escape probability, influence of recoiling target atoms, and anisotropy in the source of excited electrons [38]. Figure 4(a) simulates the first two possibilities with the model developed using the TRIM program.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…contain a ~3× reduction due to secondary electron re-absorption but with a net ~2× reduction observed due to a simultaneous increase in SEE resulting from increased mean electron incident angle. Ion-impact SEE, however (which consists of kinetic electron emission [34] and potential electron emission [35,36]) does not exhibit an incidence angle dependence for singly-charged incident ions with sub-keV energy, so these measurements may better isolate the fuzz re-absorption effect without the complication of the incidence angle effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%