2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00203-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of micro-hardness on deformation of deep-drawing steel sheets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The hardness value at O point is equal to the hardness value in elastic field. The above findings are also confirmed by Cotterell et al 8 He reported significantly higher hardness values in the region close to the crack tip, where localized deformation is occurred.…”
Section: Calculation For the Plastic Part (δ Pl )supporting
confidence: 83%
“…The hardness value at O point is equal to the hardness value in elastic field. The above findings are also confirmed by Cotterell et al 8 He reported significantly higher hardness values in the region close to the crack tip, where localized deformation is occurred.…”
Section: Calculation For the Plastic Part (δ Pl )supporting
confidence: 83%
“…A relationship between Vickers hardness and the yield stress of non-strain hardening and strain hardening materials metal was described by Tabor [3]. Other researchers have also found variations in hardness in different parts of components that connected with different deformations during processing [6][7][8][9]. Those studies revealed that plastic strain is related closely to hardness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is also well accepted for measuring the mechanical properties such as flow stress, fracture stress, elastic modulus and fracture toughness. Cotterell et al (2002) and Guelorget et al (2007) observed an increase in the micro-hardness of material after tensile testing and showed that it was due to work hardening. They also concluded that the micro-hardness in the surface of the specimen was higher than in its center and in addition, higher hardness values were recorded in the region close to the fracture surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%