2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of sodium laser guide star photon return on the geomagnetic field

Abstract: Aims. The efficiency of optical pumping that increases the backscatter emission of mesospheric sodium atoms in continuous wave (cw) laser guide stars (LGSs) can be significantly reduced and, in the worst case, eliminated by the action of the geomagnetic field. Our goal is to present an estimation of this effect for several telescope sites. Methods. Sodium atoms precess around magnetic field lines that cycle the magnetic quantum number, reducing the effectiveness of optical pumping. Our method is based on calcu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression of this parameter is given by where F R is the specific return photon flux to the ground per watt of launched laser power, where s ce is the coupling efficiency of light at 589 nm to the sodium atoms (unitphotons × m 2 /s/W/atom), C Na is the vertical column density of sodium, sec(ζ) is the secant of the zenith angle ζ (the airmass), T atmo is the single-pass transmission of the atmosphere at 589 nm at zenith, and H Na is the vertical distance from the telescope to the sodium layer centroid. We note that s ce and thus F R strongly (and to some extent nonlinearly) depend on laser power, laser spectrum, laser polarization, and angle between laser propagation direction and the magnetic field (Moussaoui et al 2008(Moussaoui et al , 2009, in addition to pulse format if any.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Return Flux Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The expression of this parameter is given by where F R is the specific return photon flux to the ground per watt of launched laser power, where s ce is the coupling efficiency of light at 589 nm to the sodium atoms (unitphotons × m 2 /s/W/atom), C Na is the vertical column density of sodium, sec(ζ) is the secant of the zenith angle ζ (the airmass), T atmo is the single-pass transmission of the atmosphere at 589 nm at zenith, and H Na is the vertical distance from the telescope to the sodium layer centroid. We note that s ce and thus F R strongly (and to some extent nonlinearly) depend on laser power, laser spectrum, laser polarization, and angle between laser propagation direction and the magnetic field (Moussaoui et al 2008(Moussaoui et al , 2009, in addition to pulse format if any.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Return Flux Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…With the increasing use of sodium LGS in astronomical AO, many studies have been done in the past years to characterize more precisely the properties of the sodium layer in the light of AO requirements. Models have been developed to predict the sodium abundance and expected photon return for different sites (Moussaoui et al 2009;Holzlohner et al 2010). The temporal behavior of sodium profiles, and the variations of the mean altitude have also been studied in detail (Herriot et al 2006;Pfrommer & Hickson 2010).…”
Section: Sodium Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A factor of two discrepancy between the sodium return per Watt specification and achieved results can partially be explained by what has been learned since 2001 about optimal, and conversely sub-optimal, laser formats 19,20,21 . The large ~2GHz spectral bandwidth of the GS laser system is partly responsible for this discrepancy.…”
Section: Sodium Photon Returnmentioning
confidence: 97%