1985
DOI: 10.1002/apmc.1985.051300109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of soiling and soil release of easy care cotton on factors‐controlling the finishing treatment

Abstract: The conventional pad-dry-cure method was used for effecting crosslinking of cotton with N-methylol finishing agents under different conditions. Factors studied include nature and concentration of finishing agent and softener, type and concentration of catalyst, and curing temperatures. Variation of soiling and soil release characteristics of crosslinked cotton with these factors were investigated. The effect of finishing agent on aqueous soiling followed the order:Carbamate reactant-fabric > DimethyMethylene u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident that inclusion of the silicone softener in the finishing formulation brings about: (1) a remarkable improve in softeness degree of the finished fabrics along with a noticeable increase in tear strength retention; (2) an improvement in the bound nitrogen, resiliency, DP rating, as well as dye reseptivity; and (3) a decrease in the carboxyl content, soil release rating, as well as whiteness indices, regardless of the used softener. This could be discussed in terms of (1) coating and/or encapsulating the cellulosic fibers with a softener film thereby enhancing the softness degree; (2) reduction of interyarn friction along with formation of interfiber and interyarn bonds thereby improving fabric resiliency and its smooth drying properties; (3) facilitating the fiber slippage as well as improving the fiber/yarn mobility within the fabric structure thereby increasing tear strength retention; (4) interaction with active ingredients in the finishing formulation, fixation onto, as well as modification of the crosslinked cellulose structure thereby increasing the bound nitrogen, decreasing the number of carboxyl groups, enhancing dye receptivity, as well as hindering and/or minimizing the soil release; and (5) thermal oxidation of the used softeners during the curing step thereby causing fabric discoloration and whiteness minimization 36–40. Changes in the values of the aforementioned performance properties upon using different softeners would be expected to rely on:33, 41–44 (1) chemical nature and molecular structure of the softener; (2) softener form, for example, elastomer, microemulsion, etc; (3) reactivity and affinity for the used substrate; (4) mode and extent of reaction and/or interaction among other ingredients as well as cellulose structure; (5) location and extent of distribution; and (6) tendency to entrap the dye molecules and retard the release of the soil particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident that inclusion of the silicone softener in the finishing formulation brings about: (1) a remarkable improve in softeness degree of the finished fabrics along with a noticeable increase in tear strength retention; (2) an improvement in the bound nitrogen, resiliency, DP rating, as well as dye reseptivity; and (3) a decrease in the carboxyl content, soil release rating, as well as whiteness indices, regardless of the used softener. This could be discussed in terms of (1) coating and/or encapsulating the cellulosic fibers with a softener film thereby enhancing the softness degree; (2) reduction of interyarn friction along with formation of interfiber and interyarn bonds thereby improving fabric resiliency and its smooth drying properties; (3) facilitating the fiber slippage as well as improving the fiber/yarn mobility within the fabric structure thereby increasing tear strength retention; (4) interaction with active ingredients in the finishing formulation, fixation onto, as well as modification of the crosslinked cellulose structure thereby increasing the bound nitrogen, decreasing the number of carboxyl groups, enhancing dye receptivity, as well as hindering and/or minimizing the soil release; and (5) thermal oxidation of the used softeners during the curing step thereby causing fabric discoloration and whiteness minimization 36–40. Changes in the values of the aforementioned performance properties upon using different softeners would be expected to rely on:33, 41–44 (1) chemical nature and molecular structure of the softener; (2) softener form, for example, elastomer, microemulsion, etc; (3) reactivity and affinity for the used substrate; (4) mode and extent of reaction and/or interaction among other ingredients as well as cellulose structure; (5) location and extent of distribution; and (6) tendency to entrap the dye molecules and retard the release of the soil particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%