1997
DOI: 10.2514/2.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of Steady Mach Reflections on the Reflecting-Wedge Trailing-Edge Angle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result the throat of the converging nozzle formed by the slipstream and the plane of symmetry line is fixed at point E, and the Mach stem height is independent of the trailing-edge angle, θ e . This fact was recently verified by Ben-Dor et al (1997b) both numerically and experimentally.…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 57%
“…As a result the throat of the converging nozzle formed by the slipstream and the plane of symmetry line is fixed at point E, and the Mach stem height is independent of the trailing-edge angle, θ e . This fact was recently verified by Ben-Dor et al (1997b) both numerically and experimentally.…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 57%
“…A brief comparison of the theoretical work by Azevedo, Li, and Ben-Dor and the current paper is presented in Table 1. The works by Li et al [6] and Schotz et al [7] consider downstream influences on the Mach stem height; however, the theoretical work of Ben-Dor et al [8] and the experimental work of Chpoun and Leclerc [9] show that the Mach stem height does not vary with downstream conditions. This is as expected, because the flow in the expansion region and downstream of the sonic throat is supersonic and therefore these influences cannot affect the Mach stem height.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…14 The comparison of the numerical transition angles for twowedge 5 -8 (Á D 0 deg) and channel 15 (Á D 90 deg) geometries shows that they are independent of Á. Though the analytical models 16; 17 give contradictorypredictionsconcerningthe dependenceof the MS size on Á, there is numerical 18 and experimental 19 evidence that its size does not depend on the base angle either.…”
Section: Background: Rr and Mrmentioning
confidence: 93%